Breaking Down Alan Williams' Coaching History

According to Jason La Canfora of NFL.com, it appears that the Vikings will ask Alan Williams to be their next defensive coordinator. The Vikings interviewed Williams on Monday, who turned in a strong interview. Williams has been a defensive backs coach in Indianapolis for 10 years, and was on the same staff as Leslie Frazier during his time in Indianapolis. With uncertainty surrounding the head coaching situation in Indianapolis, nobody's job is safe, so with the fact that the move would be a promotion means that Williams is all but the Vikings new defensive coordinator.
I'm a fan of the move, and it actually tells us a lot about what the coaching staff is going to look like next year. As it appears, the Vikings took every possible route to avoid giving the job to Mike Singletary, who did not get good reviews after this past season. Presuming the Fred Pagac will return to being the linebackers coach (I really hope he does, he's a killer one) then Singletary will probably exit quietly.
Williams has a background in the Tampa-2 defensive scheme, which is one that Leslie Frazier apparently wants to keep and run next season. Having coached the Colts' defensive backs since 2001, there is a significant amount of stats to sort through. Let's take a look at how Williams' DB's have fared during his regime in Indianapolis.
To give a quick review, Alan Williams has served as the Colts defensive backs coach for the last 10 years. He is 42 years of age, and graduated from WIlliam and Mary (where he played football) during the same year that Mike Tomlin was a freshman there. After that, he went straight to coaching and hasn't looked back. After a stint in college and then in Tampa Bay under defensive genius Monte Kiffin, he become the Colts' DB coach in 2001.
Here's a year-by-year statistical highlight breakdown of how his defensive backs fared in each year he coached there(courtesy of colts.com and pro-football-reference.com).
(EDIT: Thank you to CCNorseman for pointing out he didn't actually come onto the staff until '02. Makes the statistical improvement even more impressive than it was before.)
2001: The year before Alan Williams came onto the staff, the Colts weren't a very good team. Their overall defense was ranked 31st in the league, and they allowed 30 passing touchdowns. They did, however, get 15 interceptions, which is pretty decent. One of the defensive backs also had a 90 yard fumble return touchdown. Not a bunch of info on this year, so I'm moving on to year two!
2002: This is the first year that Alan Williams was coaching the Colts' defensive backs.. Joined on after the 2001 season, not before. Huge statistical increase from last year. Their turnover differential in the secondary went from 31st in the league (-15) to 21st in the league (-5) which may seem like its not much, but to move up 10 spots in one year is pretty significant. The defense racked up 10 interceptions, but only allowed 19 touchdowns (11 better than the prior year). The defensive backs obviously improved since he got there.
2003: Another monster statistical improvement. The turnover difference went from 21st in the league from the year prior (-5) to 6th in the league at +10. That's a +15 turnover differential increase from the year prior, not to mention the +10 it improved the year prior to that. The team also had 3 defensive touchdowns, two of them being interception returns by a defensive back.
2004: To take from Colts.com:
In 2004, six defensive backs were among the eleven Colts to produce interceptions. David (4), Nick Harper (3) and Doss (2) helped the club total 19 interceptions. The secondary had the club’s three defensive touchdowns and helped the club amass a +19 turnover ratio, the best in the team’s Indianapolis era.
That's a monster increase again, going from +10 the year prior to +19, which, add noted, is the best in team history. The increases year to year, now, are: +10, +15, +9 (team history record.) That looks pretty damn impressive to me.
Moving to '05: The notable stats here are the fact that the Colts defense had a +12 turnover ratio, and only allowed 247 points the entirety of the year, which was 2nd in the NFL at the time and the best in team history. Their point differential (+192) was first in the NFL.
2006 (Super Bowl Year): This team's stats was actually probably the worst out of all of the ones that I looked over. For those of you who don't remember watching, the Colts defense was actually atrocious going into the playoffs when it came to stopping the run, and everybody thought they were going to get trounced in the playoffs. Bob Sanders (in his third year under the tutelage of Williams) anchored the defense through the playoffs, and they won the Super Bowl. More stats from that year: +7 turnover differential, 6th in the NFL. More on the players themselves from Colts.com:
In 2006, Bethea was a 14-game rookie starter who ranked 3rd on the club with 105 tackles. He added one regular-season interception and two in the playoffs, along with 14 tackles. The secondary produced eleven of the club’s 15 regular-season interceptions, then had five in the playoffs. Jackson’s last-minute theft secured the AFC Championship Game victory over New England, and Hayden’s 56t interception vs. Chicago provided the final points in Super Bowl XLI. Sanders added a fourth-quarter interception against Chicago to help end the contest.
2007: Is by far the most impressive year in the coaching history of Alan Williams. The Colts had 22 interceptions (second in the NFL that year), and their scoring defense was first in the NFL. Bob Sanders and Antoine Bethea both received Pro Bowl honors, and Bob Sanders (whose development is accredited to Williams) became the NFL Defensive Player of the Year for 2007. The overall defense ranked 3rd in the NFL at 279.7 yards per game, the best in team history while in Indianapolis.
2008: The Colts defensive backs have been stellar during Wiliams' regime. In 2008, they only allowed 6 touchdown passes throughout the entirety of the year, which is a league record with a three-touchdown cushion (the next best is 9 touchdown passes.) The defense was 3rd in NFL Red Zone efficiency and the defensive backs had all of the team's interceptions. Bethea and Melvin Bullitt lead the team in interceptions and tackles.
2009: Rough year, because Sanders, Hayden, and Marlin Jackson all had injury-plagued years. Jerraud Powers and Jacob Lacey stepped up well, however, and helped by getting 71 and 78 tackles, respectively. Seven Colts DBs had interceptions during the regular season, and 3 DBs had postseason interceptions (Hayden, Bethea, Powers.)
2010: Also an injury plagued year, but the Colts still racked up 10 INTs, and made their 9th-consecutive postseason appearance (with much oblige to the help of Mr. Williams, who has coached every single year they made the playoffs.) A couple of journeymen (Aaron Francisco) had good seasons as well, racking up 52 tackles and 4 INTs.
2011: Not a fantastic year. Kelvin Hayden and Bob Sanders departed, leaving the club with 8 interceptions for 2011, which is a pretty meager total, though I'm not sure I would blame the entirety of that on Williams based on how the offense (cough, cough) performed this season. The team went 2-14, the worst (and most random record) since before Williams arrived.
All in all, I feel pretty confident about this hire for the Vikings. He has experience in the system, and his defensive backs obviously have had a lot of production under his tutelage. Hopefully he can take guys like Asher Allen, Chris Cook and Mistral Raymond and develop them into the type of players that he had succeed in Indianapolis. All things taken into account, I think this is a good fit, and hopefully, will yield some really positive results for the 2012-2013 campaign.
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
38 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No experience as a coordinator
At any level, this guy has never been a coordinator. It’s a different animal calling plays. I don’t doubt that he has talent as a DB coach (sure wish we would have hired him to replace Joe Woods!). But I am skeptical. Do we really want another inexperienced coordinator?
I suppose Frazier liked what he saw of him during his time in Indy, and that says something, but it’s entirely possible the entire coaching staff is gone after 2012.
Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.
we were never going to get an experienced coordinator
Morris never really ‘just’ coordinated.
Spags was never going to come here.
Mel Tucker was the only shot we had, and he didn’t want to come here, either.
skeptical is fine, but this could have been a lot worse.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
Well.. DCs are usually position coaches to begin with.
You don’t just get made into a coordinator without putting in work first. Now, granted he may not turn into a Mike Nolan or Dick Labeu, but just because he doesn’t have experience calling defensive plays doesn’t mean he will be another Pagac.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 18, 2012 4:36 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah I see what you mean.
I think it’s a system/relationship hire as well. Still, he had some pretty good years and a lot of positional coaches are given first shots at DC, like Tomlin, Frazier and Morris. I think it’s a pretty good hire. What do you think?
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear." -Mark Twain
I think the hardest aspect of a coordinator is not what DL and LB do or schemed but how your schemes relate to how/what the DBs do.
In my playing experience the best DC I have ever played for was a DBacks coach and understood coverages and how blitzes affect the secondary and how to best maximize on that.
\m/
by Edgecrusher71 on Jan 19, 2012 12:59 PM CST up reply actions
What it says to me is Frazier is trying desperately to hang onto the Tampa 2 defense
This defense has not been very good the last two years mainly due to injury (supposedly). I think it is more to do with lack of depth.
Frazier had better hope the defense improves because the secondary is suppose to be his specialty. It has not been very special at all. You would think that he could identify and develop defensive backs in order for them to succeed in this defense.
I am at a loss to provide many names of any secondary players who have improved playing under the tutelage of Frazier besides Abdullah.
yes, he is
it’s sink or swim time — the Tampa-2 is likely to live and die with LF at the helm.
though considering that’s the case, i’m glad we hired a DC who not only has experience with it, but will embrace that scheme 100%. everyone keeps saying it won’t work, but this is probably the best chance we have at it actually being successful (also hopefully with an upgrade in personnel via FA and the draft) — i have tempered-but-optimistic expectations.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
Piggy-backing onto that
I think it also says that LF doesn’t believe he’s going to be able to improve the Defensive Secondary to the point where they can effectively play man-coverage. He’ll continue to go with the status-quo and hope that what we have will be good enough, while investing draft picks and FA money elsewhere on the team.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
He wasn't hired until 2002
The stats you have for 2001 don’t pretain to Williams, as he was still with Tampa Bay at the time. Dungy didn’t come on board until 2002 either.
Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.
Good work Landonio
Thanks for the update!
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
Well, lets hope for the best!
The idea of more cover/tampa 2 defense is nauseating. I was hoping for a new direction, with a shift toward more defensive drafting(besides o-line) and more man coverage! Guess Leslie’s not.
I know...
it definitely seems like that’s the defense he’s going for. You never know, though; the Indy version of the Tampa-2 has a lot more man coverage incorporated.
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear." -Mark Twain
In other news
Frank Tarkenton Says Tim Tebow is not a very good QB lol.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 18, 2012 5:33 PM CST reply actions
So does 99% of the educated world (the 1% is Denver and Gainesville).
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 18, 2012 5:58 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
You forgot Bristol.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 18, 2012 7:35 PM CST up reply actions
Probably for the best, Bristol is a shithole.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 19, 2012 8:42 AM CST up reply actions
Are we talking about Palin?
Or the Nascar race track?
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Jan 21, 2012 11:15 PM CST up reply actions
The sea port in England
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Nice work, man!
Good write up. This gives me cautious optimism.
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be—or to be indistinguishable from—self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
― Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
I with Thor on this one... Cautious optimism
Maybe, just maybe, we luck out and have found the next defensive genius… okay, I would settle for a defense that sucks less then we did this year.
Hahaha.
I guess I should have put “totaled”.
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear." -Mark Twain
"managed" ?
Great article by the way. I’ve honestly not heard of the guy till now. He’s got a tough job ahead of him, and hopefully we can give him a little more help in the secondary.
Build up your weaknesses until they become your strong points." --Knute Rockne
Thank you abba!
I’m hoping so too. We have a lot of needs to fill. We’ll see how the pieces fall in the coming months.
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear." -Mark Twain
:) I think I'd go something like:
In 2007 Antonio Cromartie racked up 10 interceptions.
In 2010 the Colts limped to 10 inceptions.
I only meant it as another way of saying 'totaled'.
But yeah, a team having 10 interceptions is a lot worse than a player having one hahaha.
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear." -Mark Twain
I don't mean to poke holes in your theory here
But I think it’s worth pointing out that in 2002 Peyton Manning threw 19 interceptions, where as 2003 he threw 10. This will affect your +- turnover differential a lot, and that is the stat you keep pointing to during those years. To finish out up through 2006 Peyton stayed pretty steady at 10 for several years until 2006 where he only threw 9. I mean if we continue looking at turnover differential if you put Peyton’s 2003 numbers in for the 2002 year they go from -5 to +4.
I see the improvement in interceptions during those years, but that team was awful for years and when Peyton took over on offense they didn’t really have to draft for their offense a lot and had a large injection of youth and talent to their D.
I don’t mean to be pessimistic but this argument isn’t too convincing for me, and trust me I really want to like this move because I love my Vikings. Lets face it our defense is in for a large turnover for our secondary and no matter how large the improvement I will find it hard to credit this guy unless we draft 3 corners and 2 safeties and they all start over all the current people on our roster(which is possible, but not because we have to draft studs to have upgrades) and our defense rises to middle of the list in passing yards per game, TD’s given up and so on.
i agree that these stats are only a sliver of the whole picture...
but at least someone is starting to put the picture together. i want to know a lot more about this guy, but who really knows about a 10 year d-backs coach who has never even been a coordinator? i liked the “cautiously optimistic” sentiment expressed above. i’ll camp out there for now, until we know more and here from him and frazier.
but, i am not opposed to a guy with his level of experience getting a chance to take the next step. remember, he is going to be handling a very different set of responsibilities now, hopefully he has been a student of the game and formulated his own understanding of how to assemble and run a defense.
i also don’t really mind that he comes from the whole tampa-2 camp. if leslie frazier is adamant about that, and went out and got a guy who is well versed in it, then at least they will be on the same page. hopefully we can get the right players in here to fill the talent void we seem to have.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Yeah that's very true. The production from the offenses is a big part of the turnover ratio
but there is a lot to be said of his development of defensive backs (Bob Sanders, Kelvin Hayden, Melvin Bullitt) and the defense’s overall production (ALA 2006 and 2007) when they had top-3 defenses. Especially the year when they only allowed 6 passing touchdowns the entire year. That’s incredible. I’m more optimistic than I am not, but I see what you mean.
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear." -Mark Twain
thanks for putting in the effort to gather this info, it helps cuz i don't know anything about him.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
No problem!
What do you think: upgrade or downgrade from Fred Pagac?
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear." -Mark Twain
i've got no clue, time will tell.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Now that's a tough question
Because we never got to fully see what Pagac could do, One thing I will say though is that I think it is an upgrade for our secondary and that IMHO is a major plus.
I don't see how you can be a fan of this move
He hasn’t proven anything as a DC. Just another one of Frazier’s old buddies he wants to reunite with. He’ll be gone in a year.
Hey Green Bay, where's your WNBA title???
Plenty of people have not proven anything as a DC when they move into the position,
such as Mike Tomlin, who is now a super bowl winning head coach. Tony Dungy is another example. Just because they’ve worked together doesn’t mean that the move doesn’t make sense, as there is system familiarity. But since apparently he’s already coached the league’s worst defense in 2012 (which honestly you would have no way of knowing), then you can tell the Vikings that. It’s an open book.
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear." -Mark Twain
Let's see he's a real good secondary coach ...
And our secondary s pretty horrible, makes sense to me!

by 






















