Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

2012 Vikings NFL Draft compensatory picks

As has been discussed, the Vikings will likely have some extra draft picks to work with this year based on the NFL compensatory draft pick system that is put in place for the net loss of free agents from the previous offseason. The formula that the NFL uses for awarding the picks is a well-guarded secret that many NFL teams do not even know, but by looking back at past compensatory picks we can have a pretty good gauge of exactly what is used. And no, Sid Hartman does not have a "close personal friend" who knows what he's talking about when he suggested in a recent column that the Vikings will get two 4th rd picks as compensation. We can be almost certain of what picks the Vikings will receive. I'll explain in detail after the jump:

Star-divide

Before we begin, let's look at the criteria that the NFL's CBA uses to award compensatory picks:

In addition to the 32 picks in each round, there are a total of 32 picks awarded at the ends of Rounds 3 through 7. These picks, known as "compensatory picks," are awarded to teams that have lost more qualifying free agents than they gained the previous year in free agency. Teams that gain and lose the same number of players but lose higher-valued players than they gain also can be awarded a pick, but only in the seventh round, after the other compensatory picks. Compensatory picks cannot be traded, and the placement of the picks is determined by a proprietary formula based on the player's salary, playing time, and postseason honors with his new team, with salary being the primary factor. So, for example, a team that lost a linebacker who signed for $2.5 million per year in free agency might get a sixth-round compensatory pick, while a team that lost a wide receiver who signed for $5 million per year might receive a fourth-round pick.

If fewer than 32 such picks are awarded, the remaining picks are awarded in the order in which teams would pick in a hypothetical eighth round of the draft (These are known as "supplemental compensatory selections").

Compensatory picks are awarded each year at the NFL annual meeting which is held at the end of March; typically, about three or four weeks before the draft.

Couple of quick things:

  1. Picks are only awarded for outright Free Agents, not training camp cuts, cap cuts, etc.
  2. As the above notes, compensatory picks are awarded at the end of the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th rds of the draft.
  3. It's all about NET Free Agents lost. If you lose a ProBowler but sign a 1-year bottom of the roster guy, all you end up with is a 7th rd "net value" pick, not a 3rd rder.

Again, we do not know the exact formula, but based on previous year's awarded compensatory picks we can quickly see that the formula is chiefly based on annual salary, far outweighing factors like playing time and production. The foremost online authority in this regard has been "adamjt13" who hosts a blog found here: http://adamjt13.blogspot.com/ Adamjt13 has been incredible accurate in gauging previous years' compensatory picks (only missing slightly on 5-7 of the 32 in recent years) and he believes this to be a rough calculation of the compensatory pick "value" formula (from 2009) :

Last year, regardless of playing time or postseason honors, the third-round comp players had signed for at least $6.05 million per season, the fourth-round comp players had signed for $4.45 million to $5.3 million, the fifth-round comp players had signed for $3.5 million to $4.8 million, the sixth-round comp players had signed for $1.96 million to $2.6 million, and the seventh-round comp players had signed for $1.417 million or less per season. Note that the upper range for seventh-rounders could misleading because none of last year’s comp picks were for players who signed for between $1.417 million and $1.96 million. And there was an overlap for the fourth- and fifth-round values because of differences in playing time. After reconstructing the NFL’s comp equation for 2007 using my new formula, I was able to narrow down some of last year’s cutoff points by using players who qualified for the equation but did not have a comp pick awarded for them. The value range (based solely on contract size) for fifth-rounders became $3.2 million (down from $3.5 million) to $4.8 million, for sixth-rounders became $1.96 million to $3.2 million (up from $2.6 million) and for seventh-rounders became $2.025 million or less (up from $1.417 million or less). Again, there is an overlap because of differences in playing time. You’ll notice this year’s value ranges in the list a few paragraphs below this one.

Salaries generally increase about 7% each year, so if we use that formula for this past offseason we get the following for cut-offs for FA value:

  • 3rd round value: $6.922M/yr or more
  • 4th round value: $5.095M/yr to $6.067M/yr
  • 5th round value: $4.007M/yr to $5.496M/yr
  • 6th rd value: $2.244M/yr to $2.977M/yr
  • 7th rd value: $1.622M/yr or less

So what does this mean for the Vikings? Let's take a look:

Free Agents signed:

  • Charlie Johnson; $3.5M/yr for 3 years; 6th rd value
  • Remi Ayodele; $3M/yr for 3 years; 6th rd value
  • Devin Armomashodu: $685K/yr for 1 year; 7th rd value

Free Agents lost:

  • Sidney Rice; $8.1M/yr for 5 years; 3rd rd value
  • Ray Edwards; $6M/yr for 5 years; 4th rd value
  • Tarvaris Jackson; $4M/yr for 2 years; 5th rd value
  • Ben Leber; $1.25M/yr for 1 year; 7th rd value

Remember, it is NET Free Agents lost, so we are left with:

  • Devin Aromashodu's signing cancels out the loss of Ben Leber
  • Remi Ayodele's signing cancels out the loss of Tarvaris Jackson
  • Charlie Johnson's signing cancels out the loss of Ray Edwards

We get the value of Sidney Rice (3rd rder) as well as a 7th rd compensatory pick for "net value lost". Sidenote; this is a major problem with the NFL compensatory system. If you lost 4 ProBowl level Free Agents but signed 4 Free Agent players that barely make the active roster you would essentially just get 1 compensatory pick at the end of the 7th round; a "net value" pick. The system needs changing. Additional sidenote; the Vikings could have played this better. Essentially if they had signed 2 cap casualties similar Ayodele, Aromashodu or Johnson instead, we'd have 3rd rd, 4th rd, 5th rd, and 7th rd compensatory picks instead of just a 3rd and a 7th.

I will be doing this for the entire NFL shortly so we can have a "full" draft, but essentially the Vikings should get compensatory picks at the end of the 3rd and 7th rds of the 2012 NFL Draft, to be awarded in March of 2012. In addition, there are 32 compensatory picks awarded each year. If there are less than 32 picks awarded based on the Free Agency period then the extra picks go the teams that would begin an "8th round" of the NFL draft. So if there are only 29 net free agents compensatory picks and net value picks, the Vikings would gain one more compensation pick (Mr. Irrelevant) since they would hold the 3rd pick if the NFL had an "8th round".
I hope this helps everyone's understanding of the NFL compensatory picks. Any questions or comments please just let me know below.

This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.

Comment 15 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great, thank you for clarifying!

Very helpful. I hope we get a comp. 3rd.

"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear." -Mark Twain

by Landonio on Jan 2, 2012 10:54 PM CST reply actions  

What about Jenkins?

How does his signing and contract effect us?

by nmvikesfan on Jan 3, 2012 12:28 AM CST reply actions  

Jenkins does not factor in...

he was released and was not a FA under the compensatory rules. The Vikes signed him a day after he was cut.

The post above includes the exhaustive list of Viking-related FA’s that qualify (the 7 listed). Some will mention Ben Leber since he was just cut by the Rams, but he should qualify as a FA lost because he didn’t get cut until December 3rd. He spent over 10 weeks on the Rams’ roster, and that is generally the cut-off.

Again, I really would be shocked if the Vikings’ compensatory picks don’t end up being a 3rd, and 2 7ths. Rice pick in the 3rd, “net value” pick in the 7th, and “supplemental” compensatory pick in the 7th (the “would be” 8th rd).

by DJSkillz on Jan 3, 2012 12:49 AM CST up reply actions  

our draft picks should be something like:

#3
#35
#67

  1. (comp pick for Rice)
    our regular 4th rder
    our regular 5th rder
    Cleveland’s 6th rder (Mitchell trade; we lose ours from the McNabb trade)
    our regular 7th rder
    NY Giants’ 7th rder (Sage/Reynaud trade)
    New England’s 7th rder (Moss trade)
    7th rd compensatory pick (net value pick)
    7th rd compensatory pick (supplemental compensatory pick)

That’s 12 picks, without any tradedowns. Hopefully we do some interesting draft maneuvering with those spots, especially with the #3 pick on each of the 3 days of the draft. I have no doubt that Spielman will.

by DJSkillz on Jan 3, 2012 12:56 AM CST up reply actions  

dammit...

i HATE that formatting…

the above should have said “#96” for the comp pick for Rice

by DJSkillz on Jan 3, 2012 12:56 AM CST up reply actions  

I do not think they are going to get 3 comp picks

Your post is spot on IMO and you say above that they signed three and lost four. A 3rd for Rice sounds about right. A net value pick sounds about right for Edwards.

I do not see where you believe we will get that supplemental compensatory pick.

by MarkSP18 on Jan 3, 2012 12:00 PM CST up reply actions  

net value pick...

wouldn’t be just for edwards; it would be the totality of value lost (Rice/Edwards/Jackson) vs. those signed.

i guess i didn’t word it right on the supplemental pick. there are ALWAYS 32 comp picks awarded every year, and rarely do even 25 of those get awarded to teams based on FA signings. so the NFL makes up the difference (up to 32) by awarding essentially an “8th” rd. for instance, last year there were 11 supplemental picks awarded, based on draft order of what would be the 8th rd. since the vikings would pick 3rd if the nfl had an 8th rd, they’re pretty darn likely to get another “supplemental” compensatory pick there. essentially as long as there are 29 or less compensataroy picks awarded based on net and net value FA’s lost, they should have another pick. not that it will matter much at that point; we’re talking about the equivalent of Mr. irrelevant there.

make sense to you mark?

by DJSkillz on Jan 3, 2012 1:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes. Thanks for the explanation.

That is interesting if it happens. A late 7th is not bad. probably will not make the team but at least you have a jump on a guy you were thinking of inviting to the practice squad.

by MarkSP18 on Jan 3, 2012 3:14 PM CST up reply actions  

ya...

extra picks are never a bad thing; just saying it’s probably relatively meaningless at that point. we’re talking about roughly the 250th pick overall.

by DJSkillz on Jan 3, 2012 4:36 PM CST up reply actions  

That 3rd round pick for Rice.

Sounds good, especially if they can get a WR there. This class is deep in WR so they could get a good one there.

by christian220896 on Jan 3, 2012 8:58 AM CST reply actions  

ya...

it will likely only be 4-5 picks ahead of our 4th rd pick.

by DJSkillz on Jan 3, 2012 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Thanks!

That is a well researched post. Good job!

by chatter on Jan 3, 2012 2:07 PM CST reply actions  

thanks!

passing sid hartman’s ramblings is a pretty low bar. :)

by DJSkillz on Jan 3, 2012 2:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Awesome post!

Very informative.

"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin

by kcskol on Jan 3, 2012 5:07 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
You Can Breathe Slightly Easier
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image

Recent FanPosts

Jg_small
UBVs Special| Trivia! Can you name the Minnesota Vikings Starting QBs?
Small
Roster Analysis: Quarterbacks
Biggun_small
SUCK IT MARTY! - Stadium Passes MPLS 7-6
Imagescaj02y87_small
We get NO RESPECT!
Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall