Vikes should draft RGIII or Luck if available
First off I want to say that I have nothing against Christian Ponder. He was by all accounts a bit of a reach at #12 and I'd say that so far he fills that bill. That isn't to say he's bad. He was projected more like #30 overall, which is still very good, and I'd say that is more how he looked in action. I don't think Ponder will ever be an elite light-em-up kind of QB but more of a solid game manager that could succeed with a strong defense and rushing attack. And with how often he needs to leave games I'm not so sure he's a viable starter to be quite honest and might be better suited for the bench.
But Luck and RGIII are two of the best looking QB prospects since Peyton Manning. They are off the charts. They are 10 or 15 slots higher than all of the other players in the draft. The only reason you would pass on them is if you have an elite QB, and elite prospect, or a QB you owe a whole lot of money to. Vikings have none of the above quite frankly. There just isn't any reason to pass on them unless they get a huge deal to trade down.
With that said, the Rams have Bradford and are committed to him. They will trade down with the Browns and ensure themselves either Kalil or Blackmon. But if by some miracle the Browns decide to take a chance on RGIII still being available at #4, the Vikings need to do the smart thing and take RGIII, trade away either Ponder or Webb, and do whatever else they can in the draft.
Watch RGIII highlights. Ponder is nothing in comparison to this guy. The problem though is that the Vikings are likely "committed" to Ponder on some idiotic pride level and will build the offseason around him and Frazier's old coaching buddies and be content to march out the same losing combination next season. ugh.
BTW I'm an RGIII fan.
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
282 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Luck yes! RGIII NO!
If you can name me one African American running QB who’s won a SB I’ll agree with you on RGIII! Something tells me I’ll be waiting for a while.
by FLSKOLMAN on Jan 20, 2012 9:40 AM CST via mobile reply actions
Ryan Leaf.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 10:29 AM CST up reply actions
I don;t know but..
can you name me one White American running QB who’s won a SB
by midnightwonder on Jan 20, 2012 11:01 AM CST up reply actions
This shows you don’t know what a “running QB” is.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 11:34 AM CST up reply actions
I guess some definitions are in order then.
Steve Young was a threat with his arms and his legs and regularly took advantage of both. What’s the criteria for “running QB?” I don’t think I’ve ever seen it offered up as a defined term before. And once it’s defined, would you put RGIII in that category?
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Running QB:
A QB that relies more on his legs than his arm to win football games (Tim Tebow). Steve Young’s best rushing season was in 92’ when he ran for 537 yards, but he had near 3,500 passing yards to go with it.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 12:05 PM CST up reply actions
OR Running QB:
A QB that puts fear from the threat of a run into the equation (Steve Young). Any time the defense has to take into account the QB could and more than likely will take off when the opportunity presents itself could very easily be labeled a running QB. Otherwise about the only true running QBs I’ve ever seen would be Tebow and Bobby Douglas.
by VikesFanInTulsa on Jan 20, 2012 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
Steve Young never had designed runs like Tim Tebow and Cam Newton
they were brilliant scrambles when he got under pressure, so I’d call him a scrambling QB, not running.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
somewhat agree
only scrambles are only scramble behind the LOS after they cross that line it is a run and Young proved to be very good at this.
by VikesFanInTulsa on Jan 20, 2012 12:26 PM CST up reply actions
Fran Tarkenton was a running QB
Unfortunately the thousands of yards he piled up were mostly laterally, but if I am reading this chart correctly rushed for 3,674 yards, 32 TDs (10th all time?), and Randall Cunningham had 4,928 yards rushing in his career. Not mistaking what you are saying but interesting never-the-less.
Build up your weaknesses until they become your strong points." --Knute Rockne
Fran was more of a....
running for his life quarterback. Some of the most exciting plays from Vikings past were watching Fran run for his life and end up completing a long pass out of it.
by VikesFanInTulsa on Jan 20, 2012 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
According to FLSKOLMAN, Tark must have been "African American"
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:15 PM CST up reply actions
This is it exactly.
Steve Young didn’t win a SB until he became a GREAT pocket passer. That’s how you win SB’s, with a QB who can deliver the ball from the pocket. Not with a guy who uses his legs as much as his arm. RGIII throws a nice deep ball, great! So did Aaron Brooks. Can RGIII make all the throws needed by an NFL QB while standing in the pocket? That is the Question…
No you mean he didn't win an SB until Montana left
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
And yet Ponder's passing stats pale in comparison to Robert Griffin's
Griffin was by far the superior passer over Ponder. I don’t know how you can try to label him without pointing out his great passing abilities.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/player/stats//id/378497/robert-griffin-iii
/id/13966/type/college/christian-ponder" target="_blank">http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/13966/type/college/christian-ponder
Looks like Ponder threw twice as many picks per pass as Griffin. And Griffin just shredded Ponder in all other stat catagories.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 1:45 PM CST up reply actions
link fail, oops.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/13966/type/college/christian-ponder
http://espn.go.com/college-football/player/stats/_/id/378497/robert-griffin-iii
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 1:46 PM CST up reply actions
Lol
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:47 PM CST up reply actions
One of your links a fail
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:47 PM CST up reply actions
Hey why does Ponder have
defensive stats? Lol
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:48 PM CST up reply actions
because he is a future d-back for the vikings?
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 1:48 PM CST up reply actions
He's around average DB height
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:50 PM CST up reply actions
Actually he is taller than the average d-back, he's darn near 6 foot.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:00 PM CST up reply actions
6'2
I think. Wow, DB’s are shorter then I thought.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:01 PM CST up reply actions
5-9 to 5-11 on average. I'd say.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:04 PM CST up reply actions
I was talking about Ponder's height.
I believe Chris Cook is 6’2 as well. Gosh he fu*ckd up big time. He was actually coming along pretty well.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:08 PM CST up reply actions
i know, Ponder is 6-1 plus cleats...
but d-backs are generally the shorter guys.
for instance, antoine winfield is 5-9.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:09 PM CST up reply actions
Let me sign up.
I couldn’t be that worse then the one’s here. Lol, but I’d hate to come here to read the comments if I am.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:11 PM CST up reply actions
well, your fro sticks up pretty darn high ;)
so i would guess that your eye level is that of a guy 6’-0 5/8"…so I give Ponder the benefit and called him 6’-1". That said, I’ll bet you are 6’-3" with cleats, and 6’-0" with a crew cut.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:15 PM CST up reply actions
Exactly
Florida State played Florida (great defense), Oklahoma (great defense), North Carolina (good defense), Virginia Tech (good defense), and Clemson (good defense) in 2010.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 4:23 PM CST up reply actions
And lets not forget...
That nobody from the rest of the offense Ponder ran has been drafted in the NFL, save for his RG who is a backup somewhere.
Rodney Hudson, LG and LT, is the only one, you are correct
the only other one will be Bert Reed, but he’ll only go around the fourth round. Ponder was never surrounded with great offensive talent, and he still had a very good college career, we can’t judge him off of one year in a new system with better defenses and a worse offensive line. He’ll be our starter week 1, and then we can start judging.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 5:37 PM CST up reply actions
That's because Florida State is a second tier program,
that gets second tier players….even at qb.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:17 PM CST up reply actions
Wow
You don’t know anything about college football do you, we’re working on our second consecutive #1 recruiting class. You are completely ignorant, and have lost all of your credibility.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 21, 2012 4:17 PM CST up reply actions
the ACC didn't even have a top 20 team again.
While the Big 12 had 6 teams in the top 20. ACC=2nd tier.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 6:47 PM CST up reply actions
We're in agreement that the ACC sucks absolute ass,
but Florida State has been recruiting better than Oklahoma, Alabama, LSU, or anyone else in the nation over the past three years. I’d rather be in the ACC than the SEC or Big 12 anyway though; just makes it that much easier to go undefeated and play for a championship.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 21, 2012 9:43 PM CST up reply actions
By that definition, RGIII isn't a running QB.
He does not rely more on his legs than his arm. There was only one game this year in which he had more rushing attempts than passing attempts. Nearly every other game the ratio of passes to runs was between 3:1 to 5:1. And when he passes, he’s very effective.
72.4 completion percentage
10.68 YPA
37 TD: 6 INT
4293 total yards
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Not sure if being black has anything to do with it....
by Jepp The Viking on Jan 20, 2012 11:39 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed.
A running quarterback is a running quarterback. Black or white. I really don’t feel like the African American part was necessary.
by SirGrizzly on Jan 22, 2012 9:29 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
RGIII is not a running QB
This is one mistake people make evaluating RGIII in my opinion. He does have rushing skills and they did use the zone read. But those skills do not take anything away from how lethal of a passer he proved to be for Baylor.
He is a pass first QB with a canon arm, lightning quick release, and with great accuracy downfield. He is very smart with the football. He makes quicker reads than Andrew Luck. He completed 72% of passes with a 10.7 yard average and a 37:6 TD:INT ratio. He did this on an otherwise weak team. If he was slow and white and put up those numbers people wouldn’t question him going 1 or 2. I don’t see how running a 4.4 makes him a lesser QB.
RGIII had vastly superior passing statistics to Andrew Luck, for example. Honestly I don’t think of a college QB that you can directly compare to RGIII because to my knowledge a man that fast has never put up those passing numbers in college.
The reason Luck is the top dawg is because Luck ran a pro style offense and did so much changing of plays at the line. He is NFL ready. Griffin is still raw in those regards but so are most all QB’s coming out of college.
RGIII played in a conference that doesn't play Defense...
Oh look! Another Big 12 QB who put up gaudy passing stats!
uh, an ACC team wouldn't stand a chance against a Big 12 defense.
Ndamukong Suh is going to tear your head off now and eat it for lunch.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:12 PM CST up reply actions
Florida State’s defense laughs in your face >: )
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 3:56 PM CST up reply actions
Nobody gives a crap about that second rate team from a second rate conference.
FSU I mean.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:18 PM CST up reply actions
^ WHAT?!
You show that you know nothing about football with that above comment. They DO NOT play defense in that conference and every year QB’s put up great stats in that conference. Will no longer waste my time debating football with something named “REVENGEFORWEBB”
by FLSKOLMAN on Jan 21, 2012 10:22 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Andrew Luck has/is called the best QB prospect in the last 10 years
So since you’re saying RGIII is better than Luck, he must be the best QB prospect in forever?
Billick: "What did McNabb do to deserve being benched?"
Answer: He upset PETA by killing every worm he came across on a football field.
If you can name me one African American running QB …
nice try, bozo.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:10 PM CST up reply actions
No
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 9:54 AM CST reply actions
Um, RGIII is number 6 on the big boards. That's not off the charts or higher then Matt Kalil even, who we could use.
But Luck and RGIII are two of the best looking QB prospects since Peyton Manning. They are off the charts. They are 10 or 15 slots higher than all of the other players in the draft.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 9:55 AM CST reply actions
Luck or RGIII would look just as bad behind our Line.
If RGIII is on the board when we pick it will be because the Rams have turned down trades and selected Kalil.
If that is the case then we MUST trade down 1-3 spots and pick Reiff and at least an extra 2nd rounder.
You cannot judge Ponder on the 10 games he has started – no LT and little help at WR. give him the tools and i’m confident he will perform.
by Scottish Viking on Jan 20, 2012 9:56 AM CST reply actions
Plus he has more NFL
wins then any QB in the draft.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 9:58 AM CST up reply actions
I wouldn't go there
His winning percentage is pretty ugly.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
He wasn't really bragging about Ponder's lone win
it’s more about Ponder having NFL experience.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 11:54 AM CST up reply actions
^ What he said.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:38 PM CST up reply actions
I didn't take the comment too seriously.
Who’s the worst QB to ever play in the NFL? Whoever he is/was he has more experience than any of the guys in the draft this year. Not really a compelling point in favor of picking him or Luck or RGIII.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Luck isn't even in the Picutre. He's gone with the first pick.
I just don’t feel we should take steps back this year with a new QB when we already have one that actually has potential. I’d rather that pick this year go towards the OLINE or DB.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:39 PM CST up reply actions
Irsay is starting to consider RGIII as an option...
He has been talking about it for the last few days. That does not mean he will, only that there is a slim possibility.
I should also mention...
If I had a coaching staff that was used to working with a tall, big-armed, accurate QB not known for making plays with his feet; I would keep them on staff if I intended to Draft a tall, big-armed, accurate QB not known for making plays with his feet.
But if I were intending to draft a QB who was completely different, I would be more likely to jettison my coaching staff and try to find someone who is more likely to succeed with a hybrid guy like RGIII.
I am not sayin’, just sayin’.
So Luck just might fall to us?
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 6:53 PM CST up reply actions
I dunno.
The jettisoning of the coaching staff does not make a whole lot of sense to me if they decide to go with Luck.
But if they don’t take him, I can all but guarantee you that Luck will come off the board @ #2 whether it be through trade, or Jeff Fisher grabbing his franchise QB.
I'm not confident he will perform
And he is hurt too often as the OP stated. That is the main problem for me. I know there are many excuses for why and examples of how others were hurt and then were fine, yada, yada, yada.
All I know for sure is that I am not confident at all in his abilities or his chances of completing a 16 game season.
I am hoping he alleviates my worries and proves me wrong if you will.
I get your stance that you think he can't last 16 games
but please explain a bit further why you aren’t confident that he will perform? I’m not going to nag on and on in the pathetic talent we had but that plays a big role.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 10:04 AM CST up reply actions
I do not like his throws to the outside or deep. He has enough arm strength to get the ball there but it is the time it takes to get there that is a concern of mine. But it is early to tell if he will improve or not. When you consider that there were some noises being made about Webb having a shot at the job via open and fair (doubtful) competition, then it makes you think if they really believe he will become that QBOTF.
Heck, RG3 or Luck may not either. The point is that if the Vikings are looking at RG3 at #3 then they have to get a really good package to trade down. If they do not then they should take him IMHO. I would. In fact, I would not even entertain offers to trade down.
I like having RG3, Ponder, and Webb on the team. One of the three should develop into that QBOTF. The other can be the backup or get traded for picks. Very good picks too.
I view this as being in a position of strength. It has been years since the Vikings had the QB position being a position of strength. Philly ended up getting a 2nd and Rogers-Cromartie for Kolb. Not too bad at all.
If the Vikings take Claiborne, Blackmon, Reiff, or Martin at #3 it is unlikely they can get that kind of package for those players in a couple of years. And they have just as much chance of being a bust as RG3 or Luck. Probably more.
Idk I'd like to think QBs have a higher chance of being busts
then any other positions and I don’t really think we should draft thinking, “Oh, we’re going to trade this player if he doesn’t work out.”
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:42 PM CST up reply actions
Why trade Ponder, he could be a back up.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:18 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe if he doesn't pan out
which I don’t expect will happen.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:19 PM CST up reply actions
.. Then we just have Webb as #3 again.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 20, 2012 10:16 PM CST up reply actions
Then he would have to actually compete against Webb.
And we know who would played better head-to-head in the off-season. Plus, If the vikings ended up with Griffin, then it would make even more sense to keep Webb and trade Ponder. I think we might be able to get a 2nd or 3rd rounder for Ponder, but that would certainly be a loss. Better just hand him the starting position and crown him the future hall of famer, so the coaches and “gm” won’t be embarassed by their pick at this point.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:22 PM CST up reply actions
I actually dont think Health is going to be a problem for him.
The injuries he had this year were what? A hip pointer on a massive hit, which then got aggrevated with a big open field smash and a concussion after taking 2 helmet to helmet shot in the space of 2 weeks?
The open field hit wont be happening again, that ball will be thrown away before taking the hit – that will have been learnt.
Give him some more time in the pocket and more relaible targets and i dont think he will be in the position to take the really big hits that he has had.
and name me a player that can take bad helmet to helmet hits and not get concussed….
by Scottish Viking on Jan 20, 2012 10:09 AM CST up reply actions
Ponder was lit up a TON
Yeah he was only injured on 3 seperate plays but he was roughed up a lot more than that. And did you notice that when Webb was in there he wasn’t getting crushed as much. Defenses were respecting Webb’s passing and running abilities more than Ponder.
Come to think of it, I don’t know exactly what, other than draft order, makes anyone think Ponder is a better QB today than Joe Webb. Webb has better statistics and winning percentage and our offense scores more points per quarter when he’s on the field.
You said Ponder was lit up a TON. That's a HUGE reason for his regression.
Which means with his skill sets the offense didn’t help him much. We’d have more success building around Ponder’s skills then Webb’s.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:43 PM CST up reply actions
Ponder panics in any form of pressure and makes poor decisions.
that is the problem, and the downfield and sideline route passes.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 1:50 PM CST up reply actions
I'm just waiting to see how he does next season
which I think will be fine. The man’s a workaholic, I feel he’ll get better, but his performance will speak louder then words or any of our opinion’s.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:52 PM CST up reply actions
than*
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:19 PM CST up reply actions
Noticed that myself.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:20 PM CST up reply actions
Sorry, I didn't mean to be rude. But that is a common one.
Too bad they don’t have auto-grammar-correct!
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:36 PM CST up reply actions
No hard feelings.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:42 PM CST up reply actions
Because he was a rookie.
That’s why he panics. Pretty much every rookie quarterback panics when faced with the defenders in the NFL. People need to get used to the fact that we have a young QB now who needs to learn. Not a 10+ year pro like we’re used to.
But notice how Ponder was lit up and Webb wasn't
Avoiding sacks is also the QB’s job and Ponder ain’t too good at it.
Don’t get me wrong, no QB is going to look good with our o’line and WR’s. Yes Kalil would help Ponder. But at the same time look at what Newton did with a terrible Carolina offense. Look at what Peyton Manning consistently does with a team that is 1-15 without him. If you have an amazing QB it makes everyone else look better.
If you have a mediocre QB then you sit and talk about how much help they need.
But at the same time look at what Newton did with a terrible Carolina offense.
What? You mean the offense who was ONLY missing a good QB? Great Oline, good RBs, a possible HOF WR and good tight ends?
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:43 PM CST up reply actions
Whoa, whoa.
Steve Smith isn’t a possible HoFer. No way. He’s good, but he’s not that good.
Other than that, I agree with the sentiment. Let’s not forget that was basically the same team that went 12-4 with Jake Delhomme. They just imploded the next couple years.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 20, 2012 10:18 PM CST up reply actions
If Smith...
Had played for NE, he would be a HOF’er. He WAS that good.
Ponder ain't too good at avoiding sacks?
You must have been watching a different QB than I was.
Now, he could learn to take a sack rather than forcing a pass and getting hit, but to say he is bad at avoiding sacks means you just were not paying attention.
His latest injury was because he couldn't make a decision on the field
and threw the ball late and thus took a big time hit. He could have done the smart thing and thrown the ball away, and avoided a big hit and injury. And that was on a roll out play.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:25 PM CST up reply actions
this has been done to death.
Webb is still an unknown quantity – if he played every week, teams would have him figured out very quickly. look at his last outing, the bears probably trained for the event that he would play a bit, they had him sussed right away.
Once teams realised that they could get to Ponder through blitzing he struggled, but he’ll learn.
I don’t think Webb can learn to be a better passer.
Ponder got his fair share of hits and the only ones that took him out of games were 2 helmet hits and two big hits to the same hip.
by Scottish Viking on Jan 20, 2012 1:49 PM CST via Android app up reply actions
If he actually got snaps at qb in practice, he would probably do better.
Ponder was getting all the first team snaps, while Webb didn’t even get ANY snaps in practice before the last game when Ponder needed someone to relieve him…again.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 1:52 PM CST up reply actions
Actually Webb started getting reps with the first team
at the end of the season.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:53 PM CST up reply actions
He got ZERO reps at qb at all in the last week of practice.
He on;y got first team reps after Mcnabb left and when Ponder didn’t practice.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:21 PM CST up reply actions
I was just stating that he did get first team Reps.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:22 PM CST up reply actions
I thought the sum total of Webb's 1st team QB reps were...
5 days. All in advance of the game against the Redskins.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
why?
Why do you push for Webb so hard? You would (likely) just be disappointed if he were the starter next year. In fact, you would probably make all the excuses which people are currently making for Ponder like poor line, bad recievers, etc. when Joe starts. Webb is lucky to sit behind the starter(s) and learn the game at an NFL level when his team has a terrible pass blocking line. Maybe he will get an opportunity to start at the right time when the team has a better line and more weapons. I felt bad for Ponder this year. What a terrible situation to get thrown into. Just my opinion.
Good points Scottish
and all the more reason the grab RG3 while the Vikings can.
Between RG3 and Ponder they should be able to get that QB. I hope.
Webb can continue to develop and be that super backup.
All I know for sure is Ponder is no guarantee and neither is RG3.
Would things be different with Luck?
And I don’t mean skills wise either. Part of the problem Ponder had this past year was the offensive line was collapsing on him. While Luck may possess some of that extra zing in the arm, there is still no 100% chance with Luck, like there was no 100% chance with Ponder being the guy. but from what I’ve seen when he hasn’t been running for his life, I’m happy with that smart and solid game manager instead of the “kick the tires and light the fires big daddy” player.
As my fellow New Mexican NMVike has stated regaurinding the defensive layouts the past few days, if you have lacking talent around you, no matter who you have playing, it’s going to not be pretty. Upgrade the talent, and the play will upgrade. Well, that is if you name isnt Ryan Leaf or anyone who’s played on the Browns in the last 12 or 13 years.
That high pick is much better spent on offensive line and the rest of the picks on defense. Besides, the odds are he would be gone or a trade for someone to pick above us who could use him.
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
Ponder has extremely limited downfield passing skills
Ponder’s biggest knock coming out of college was that he had never shown great passing skills downfield. Teams play everyone close to the line knowing that he is unlikely to beat them deep. Griffen and Luck are polar opposites to this at the college level.
You mean...Dilfer was right?
Yep, the scouting reports were pretty accurate, i guess. I hope the Vikes stick to a short passing game with lots of running while Ponder is in the game.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 1:54 PM CST up reply actions
Tell that to the Packers
On his first play as a starter. He may not be a long ball passer, over half the time, but he can definately get it down field, so kind of a mute point there. I’d rather have someone who can do the more precise short yardage and less mistakes then a guy that has the arm to hurl it down field every play and hope nothing get’s picked off.
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 20, 2012 2:24 PM CST up reply actions
That was a great surprise play call. I remember the reciever
had to stop and wait for the ball to get to him, catch it, then turn around and start running. It was a good thing that there wasn’t a defender within a mile of him, so he had time to wait for the “seriously underthrown pass”.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:39 PM CST up reply actions
100% correct.
I remember it the same way. It was an incredibly exciting play. It was not a great throw.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
It was also a roll out LEFT...nobody was expecting it on his first play, if i recall.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:48 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah.
Cornerback left Jenkins to come up and stop the run… then realized his mistake too late.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
As I recall
The CB (Williams I think) came up to jump the out route and the ball was underthrown which is why it didn’t result in a TD, if it’s the play I’m thinking of at least.
by Simply_Greatness on Jan 21, 2012 8:05 AM CST up reply actions
Yea...
So we are knocking a guy because he is not able to wing the ball 70 yards down field while rolling to his left?
Bias is hard to overcome
To me, it isn’t worth arguing over the anti-Ponder people any more. Ponder will be much better this upcoming season, and they’ll be more quiet. But never fully on board with him.
I'm not anti-Ponder. I just don't make excuses for him.
He has to prove himself to me before I crown him any type of future solution at the qb position. You don’t see me looking to draft a qb this year, do you (unless Andrew Luck falls to us). I hope he improves, but I don’t see him as a star quality prospect like so many people seem to.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:28 PM CST up reply actions
I know, we've been through this before
I think you do not like Ponder, no matter what. Of course if he lights it up next year and wins a Super Bowl, you’ll like him then but short of that, I have a feeling he just isn’t your type of guy.
I can’t speak for all pro-Ponder people, so I will only speak for myself. I had some doubts through the season, but I think he will do much better because he is a workaholic and determined to succeed. That is a major plus. He has enough skills to succeed too and he will work to increase his strength. If he had the OL that Brees and Stafford had, along with the weapons to throw too, he will be great. Seriously, I think we have to give the guy more than a partial season with nothing to help him along before we declare him a bust, which I do not think he will be.
If we went through it before, then why try to repeat yourself.
I know, we’ve been through this before I think you do not like Ponder, no matter what.
I like Ponder just fine, but he is not more than a Sanchez or McCoy type of player. I want to see him get better, but it remains to be seen if he can become a decent nfl qb. He has deficiencies in his make up, those are just the facts. Get over it. I have also not called for him to be dumped, and I have said let’s see how he does next year. You don’t seem to want to acknowledge that. One thing I am not, is a florida state homer or a silly viking fan that bandwagons a reach pick and gets dreamy-eyed about him as though he is some kind of savior. Too bad you are affected by a realistic perspective, you don’t seem to like it when people speak the truth.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 6:55 PM CST up reply actions
Your actions, meaning the incessant anti-Ponder comments
give you away. You do not like Ponder “just fine”. That’s ok, you don’t have to, but he is no Sanchez or McCoy. I think he will be better, but we’ll see.
I like Ponder “just fine”. I am not gung ho on him and no one else but him, as I entertained the Luck talk when we had a shot, but I do not want to go after RGIII. Not worth the damage done to the franchise and I do not think Webb is the answer because if Chicago has him figured out, then everyone else will soon enough if he doesn’t learn to be a pocket QB.
As for “the truth”, get over yourself. Many on here have tried to tell you that your version of the truth is pure garbage. When you start harping on a guy’s size, who happens to be taller than RGIII, it’s getting to be absurd. Your truth has not played itself out yet. You harping on and on about it will not affect anything regarding this franchise and this QB so just what are you trying to accomplish with this constant, 1000 anti-Ponder comments of the “truth”?
Maybe you should stop trying to play "thought police".
Like I said, I’m not anti-ponder. There is no use trying to label me as something that I am not. It is obvious that you can’t handle an opinion that doesn’t match your own. Try speaking for only yourself, not for me and not for others. I haven’t even suggested that we should take Griffin either. I could repeat myself, but I’ll bet you would choose to misread my statements andtry to “profile” me.
Maybe you should stop trying to play “thought police”.
I think you would make a terrible cop.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 8:28 PM CST up reply actions
That comment
makes it perfectly clear to me that you are Danny Lloyd.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 21, 2012 9:43 PM CST up reply actions
and jethrophet
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 21, 2012 9:44 PM CST up reply actions
Eh, Danny Lloyd
was all for expressing that mobile QBs are the new evolution of the QB position, but they will never get a fairshake in this league. R4Webb doesn’t really take that approach. He, like us all, ultimately wants the Vikings to have the best QB in position to help this team win. Some want to stick it out with Ponder because they feel he will be a good QB and others don’t think that much of Ponder and see new comers as upgrades and don’t see a problem with upgrading the most important position in football. As of today, Pro-Ponder, Semi-Ponder, or Anti-Ponder fans’ opinions doesn’t matter, because at the end of the day it’s really on the Front-Office, Coaches, and Ponder to make things happen in put us in the best position to win.. And since we have bigger holes then the QB position, the O-Line and secondary should be starters, to helping us.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 21, 2012 10:02 PM CST up reply actions
What is with all of this Ponderosis stuff?
According to your catagories, I’s say I’m in a “Semi-Ponder” catagory. He does a lot of things well, but his scouting reports llook pretty spot on. So, I need to see him overcome the problem areas and just play more mistake free and make the smart decisions to keep the chains moving.
In order to win, the vikings will need to finally create a balanced roster and get clear and smart on how to actually run the team. I have my apprehension about the latter happening with the latest regime changes. But I agree, there are bigger problems to address than qb. We have a couple of goos young prospects to work with, but there is no way I would assume that any of thewm are going to be a future star.
Someone else said that they would rather have a solid balanced team over having an elite qb with a sucky defense et al…I would have to say that I agree with that.
Some people here are so defensive about any ideas that don’t buy into some stupid party line.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 10:13 PM CST up reply actions
That was actually me who said that about the balanced team over Elite QB
thank you for mentioning that :). But I have no problem in you having a different perspective then me and I’m Pro-Ponder. After taking off my shades I do understand your points and they are really good concerns and deep down we Pro-Ponder guys know that it’s the truth, well mostly, but we will stick with our guy until the end. I was Pro-Tjack, Pro-Culpepper, Pro-Almost Every young QB the Vikings have drafted and was put into the starting role. Heck, even Pro-Webb last year. I actually do not know much about RGIII and really haven’t watched much of him because I tune in to SEC games and not many outside of the SEC but the stats do back up some arguments; however, this year just isn’t the appropaite year to select a QB in the first round again with many more glaring holes on this team. If we went in with McNabb and Webb this year, I would be all for RGIII. But the problem is Ponder. He’s our starter. He will have to erase doubts in everyone’s mind. He will have to prove he can throw the types of throws to make it in this league. He will have to improve his decision making. It’s all on him and after only one season playing, he should get another chance to prove that he can improve and be the QB we hope he can be.
Also, where a QB is drafted really doesn’t matter now in days. If he’s your guy, take him. It’s that simple. Reach or not. The True QBs will prevail in any situation, so Ponder has a long way to go to prove that to us.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 21, 2012 10:37 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly. Well said.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 10:52 PM CST up reply actions
As for Joe Webb,
I’m lost on what to do with him. It’s kind of scary that he might just actually be a Good QB AND can make defenders twist their ankles in the process. Although I’m a pro-Ponder guy, I really do feel that Webb has earned a chance to start as well. It’s crazy exciting when Webb’s in. IDK about other Pro-Ponder guys but I think very highly of Joe Webb and think this kid can do some damage in this league at the QB position with the appropriate grooming. Just let the two battle it out and take all personal feelings about the situation out of the equation and let the best man be the winner.
And Speilman said he wouldn’t draft a QB in the first round. He did not say Ponder will be the starter come regular season.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 21, 2012 10:58 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
You seem to misunderstand me
You are entitled to your opinion, but I do not think you like Ponder just fine. If you did, you would be able to write a positive about him once in a blue moon. I like Ponder and I do have some concerns about him, but think he will overcome these concerns. He needs an offensive football around him and he’ll do fine.
Chicago has him figured out??
Chicago has a very good defense and neither Ponder or Webb had time to do anything. As for Webb needing to learn to be a pocket passer? What game are you watching?? Webb sits in the pocket as well as anyone when the O-line gives him protection, unless you’re referring to that worthless blazer package. That’s not on Webb.
Yes, Chicago has him figured out
The talk prior to that game, especially here, was that Webb has grown and deserved to be the starter and Ponder was no good. I’m paraphrasing, but you get the idea. Everyone was on the Webb bandwagon, even the doubters. That game showed just how much Webb needs to learn and yes, he needs to be a pocket QB. By that, I mean he still wants to do too much with his legs. Once his legs were taken away from him (Chicago) he has to win with his arm and it showed just how short he fell there.
Pocket passing is something both our QBs need to improve on a lot.
To be honest both Ponder and Webb were more effective when they broke the pocket and extended plays with their legs whether it was running or throwing while on the run. Defenses figured out that our whole offense sucks when you bring pressure because the O-line couldn’t protect either QB.
I think everybody can agree that it’s hard to be a pocket passer when our O-line routinely failed to actually form a pocket : )
by CanadianViking on Jan 22, 2012 1:39 PM CST up reply actions
Webb still wants to do too much with his legs??
Actually it was more of a necessity than a choice. Chicago has a very good defense and the Vikings offensive line couldn’t protect Ponder or Webb. It’s really hard to evaluate either QB until the Vikings upgrade the offensive line. Both of these QB’s could be very good. Do you remember what Webb did after shaking off Julius Peppers? He bought time with his legs so he could THROW. A lot of so called “pure pocket passers” would have been running for their life . Not Joe. He set up and threw perfectly——threading the ball between two defenders for a first down. Imagine shat he could do if he were to get meaningful snaps, instead of running the scout team. Joe is a pocket passer when given time.
When recievers are that wide open that far down the field,
QB’s don’t lead the ball to them, they throw it short to make sure the pass is caught for a giant gain. This is a fact, Aaron Rodgers did the same thing when Woodson got wide open in our first game.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 4:25 PM CST up reply actions
When recievers are that wide open that far down the field, QB’s don’t lead the ball to them…
That is a dumb statement.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:29 PM CST up reply actions
Try throwing a football
as a right handed quarterback running left and trying to get it 40+ yards down the field. It’s a hard thing to do.
Without a deep ball threat from time to time...
…defenses will focus on the short passing attack which will make it tougher to get completions and make it more prone to interceptions. A sub 60% completion percentage for a short throw specialist is not a compelling stat.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Can't have a deep ball threat
without deep threat receivers. :)
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:48 PM CST up reply actions
You can actually.
But it’s more difficult for sure.
For what it’s worth, a big point of emphasis in Bill Walsh’s West Coast offense was the idea of softening up the defense with short passes and then hitting them deep. Teams have to respect the QBs ability to make them pay for over playing the short stuff. Ponder can’t do that today… it remains to be seen if he can do it in the future.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
And oh yeah. A little Deep ball action for you
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:51 PM CST up reply actions
That was cool.
But I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Ponder’s two most memorable deep balls were on plays in which there was blown coverages. In this case, a linebacker shows up near the end of the play (but doesn’t turn his head to the ball). Through the rest of the route Harvin is uncovered.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Who cares about the route
Harvin was more then covered at the point of catch. I’ve seen more then a few plays by other teams or even ours where the route was open but at the point of catch, the coverage succeded. Here, there was coverage but the ball still got in there.
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 20, 2012 4:02 PM CST up reply actions
That was not coverage... that was recovery.
In coverage, the defender (a cornerback) would have turned to see the ball. At that point, the placement of the ball would have been a problem.
Still, I agree that QBs across the league often put the ball up in the air with the expectation that a receiver will make a play for it and prevent an interception. I’m not arguing that Ponder shouldn’t have made the throw. I’m arguing that it is not a good example of a QBs ability to put the ball deep. It was not a particularly good throw. It worked out just fine, but it was not the sort of throw that puts to rest concerns about Ponder’s ability to throw an accurate deep ball.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
That was coverage
The guy from aAtlanta does turn his head then back on Harvin. If that balls was less then 100% accurate, it’s an incomplete or possible INT. So if that was at least a decent throw, only thing I can see is the ball should have been spit shined and gold plated by Ponder before he threw it.
For whatever reason, you guys aren’t going to give up on wasting a pick for another 1st round QB and kinda tired of beating my head against the wall. We both disagree and will be throwing up points and counter points and walking away before it gets old.
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 21, 2012 1:24 PM CST up reply actions
It was just a hail mary throw, that was short.
It is not a very good example to point to for downfield accuracy. I’d like to see him throw a deep ball to a receiver where he drops in in over the top down the sideline where the receiver can actually catch it in stride. That is the type of nfl throw that the good qbs in the league can make. But, that is not a strength of Ponder. I don’t need him to be a stud, but there are some basic throws that allow the offense to spread the defense that he needs to show he has the ability to make without throwing picks.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:33 PM CST up reply actions
Nope.
The guy from Atlanta did NOT turn his head. The first replay they show makes that pretty clear. As the ball is coming in, the linebacker’s eyes are on Harvin. The only time the linebacker’s head moves is as his eyes follow Harvin as Harvin adjusts on the ball coming in on his left. That made the linebacker double back. Had the linebacker watched the ball coming in he could have put his mitts on it. Had he been a non-Viking cornerback, he probably would have had himself an INT.
I’ll agree with you on this point: It was a decent ball. It wasn’t bad. It also wasn’t well thrown, but it was effective on this play. The debate will continue to go on about whether or not Ponder has it in him to throw a NFL-calibre deep ball.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Ponder had 23 balls to go 20+
in his time playing. That’s a pretty good number.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 4:55 PM CST up reply actions
That's not 20+ through the air though. The majority of those 20+ pass plays involved a lot of YAC and the actual throw travelled 0-15 yds.
There’s a reason every time Ponder’s arm strength and deep ball accuracy comes up that there’s only two passes brought up for examples. There’s the Harvin TD and the Jenkins pass to the 1 yard line and that’s about it.
by CanadianViking on Jan 21, 2012 1:56 AM CST up reply actions
Again you can't throw a
50 yard bomb with NO receivers reliable enough to catch it. People can key it directly on Harvin and not feel threatened by anyone else on our offense because they aren’t a deep threat. That’s a big part of the reason.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 21, 2012 9:07 AM CST up reply actions
And also 3 seconds or less is not a long time
to even get your feet set to throw a long ball behind this line.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 21, 2012 9:08 AM CST up reply actions
Both your points are true but regardless of our crappy O-line and WRs I haven't seen enough to be totally confident in Ponder's arm.
Can he get stronger and more accurate on deeper passes? Yes he can, but until I see him throw an out to the sideline with zip or complete more downfield passes it’ll be a concern for me. I’m not expecting 40-50 yard bombs to happen all the time but I do want to see if he’s able to throw a good out pattern and throw the intermediate 25-30 yard passes downfield with more zip and accuracy. Right now Ponder’s area of strength is inside the numbers throwing passes that travel 0-15 yards in the air. I want to see him make the throws that are necessary to use the whole field and spread a defense out.
by CanadianViking on Jan 21, 2012 10:36 AM CST up reply actions
Fair enough.
We’ll have to wait and see. I’m just glad you didn’t just flat out say Ponder won’t get any better and improve especially in the areas you mentioned, like so many here have already made up their minds that he won’t but won’t admit that.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 21, 2012 10:47 AM CST up reply actions
I'm not sold on Ponder yet but I believe that both him and Webb can and will improve upon their weak areas so It'd be unfair to write either of them off already.
Both of our young QBs have flashed their talent and I just hope one of them becomes a good/great starter for the Vikings regardless of my current preference. It’s way too early to tell how good/bad Ponder will turn out to be, so while I have concerns I’ll wait and see how he develops.
by CanadianViking on Jan 21, 2012 11:28 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
^^This
is being very reasonable.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 21, 2012 11:56 AM CST up reply actions
What CanadianViking said
As I’ve pointed out before, there’s a difference between throwing a 50 yard bomb and throwing a ball to Harvin behind the line of scrimmage that he takes for a 50 yard TD. Defenses eventually wise up to the QBs weaknesses and play to shut down his strengths. I don’t think it’s any coincidence that Ponder had an awful month of December.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
No deep threat WR = Rare Long ball
completions. That simple.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 21, 2012 9:09 AM CST up reply actions
Plus Little time to throw
makes it even worse.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 21, 2012 9:11 AM CST up reply actions
the pocket is collapsing too soon.
we have recievers (aromashodu, harvin) that can get down field, but they are slowed by bump coverage as our recievers rarely get a free release. We need a better PASS protection line and Rudolph to run more vertical seam routes ala the Gronk with NE. That would make any QB of ours look better.
The pass was short and off target too. Thankfully we have a Harvin out there.
I’m just wondering why we had to throw it on FOURTH DOWN. It’s cuz Ponder couldn’t complete his passes on 1st and 3rd down in that series.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 3:02 PM CST up reply actions
wow you are really good at spinning everything
Billick: "What did McNabb do to deserve being benched?"
Answer: He upset PETA by killing every worm he came across on a football field.
So basically
Every pass that Ponder has thrown above 20 yards has been a blown coverage? And every correction a receiver makes is lack of passing ability by Ponder? There have been many games I’ve seen over the years, by both great and crappy QB’s that have required the WR to make an adjustment, and both types of QB’s that have made plays with blown coverage. Can’t tell me that everything has just been “good luck” for Ponder. I won’t debate he doesn’t have the greatest arm, no, but he has more then enough ability to spread the ball, short, mid and deep, just as much ability as Webb does.
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 20, 2012 3:54 PM CST up reply actions
Simply wrong.
Ponder and Webb are different players. Ponder has strengths that Webb doesn’t have and vice versa. Webb throws a much better (stronger and more accurate) deep ball than Ponder. That doesn’t mean that 100% of Webb’s deep throws are accurate. The best deep ball QB in the league statistics wise is Eli Manning, and he only completed 40% or so of his deep throws. The point is that Webb can throw a deep and accurate ball. Ponder has not shown that ability yet, and it’s worrisome.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
where do you come up with this kind of assumption?
I was commenting on one specific play and the context of that play.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:35 PM CST up reply actions
Actually Ponder put the ball EXACTLY
where it had to be because if not it would’ve hit the LB in the back. Great Pass by him. And you are just so negative about Ponder. I don’t really get it.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 4:46 PM CST up reply actions
Because he desperately wants to be right.
and he has already saddled himself on his support of Webb.
He reminds me of Chilly trying to stick by Tjack.
Webb is promising, but I rather like the idea of having TWO QB prospects that look to be good options. Whether Ponder or Webb takes the reins, I will be happy.
Or more recent
A certain someone who had a rather unearthly man love for another certain someone who wouldn’t be retired and “guaranteed” who would be leading us to the land of milk and honey even today……
shudders
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 20, 2012 7:16 PM CST up reply actions
lol
Yeah, but you weren’t borderline wanting to locked up in a prison cell with him and calling him “Daddy”
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 20, 2012 10:49 PM CST up reply actions
My comments had nothing to do with Webb.
I am not negative on Ponder, but he has limitations and people seem to gloss over them and assume that he is going to be some type of savior. I think Webb should get the chance to be developed at qb only, and then given the same chance to compete for a starting job that any other player in the nfl should get. This coddling of Ponder makes me want to puke. It isn’t going to make him better, he needs to know that the job is earned and there are no guarantees. If he can’t handle a little pressure in practice, I don’t think he will be able to handle actual pressure in the games (see his many picks where he had no pressure what-so-ever).
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:39 PM CST up reply actions
So we need huge numbers
In order to win?
Again, Ponder has shown the ability to throw deep, and again, not every play. I don’t know, but with a guy you can complete both the short, intermediate passes, then throw a few very deep passes, on top of a good running game, hence why we need an offensive line alot more then Luck, would be more then enough to keep a defense spread out and worried about any type of pass.
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 20, 2012 3:58 PM CST up reply actions
Well, you are being generous in your assessment of Ponder's passing ability.
But the vikings do need an o-line and need to beef up several other positions.
But as for Luck, if by any chance he fell to us, that is a no-brainer, take Luck
and don’t look back. He is head and shoulders above any yoiung qb prospect.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:42 PM CST up reply actions
RGIII is Akili Smith 2.0
Highly athletic QB who’s had one great year in college. Your argument for drafting RGIII has to be more than “He won the Heisman and I think he’ll be really, really good”
by FLSKOLMAN on Jan 20, 2012 10:01 AM CST via mobile reply actions
He is.
Cam Newton can absolutely beat you standing in the pocket throwing the football.
No, No, and No
RGIII completed 72% of his passes while winning the Heisman. Akili Smith completed 58% of them in his best season. No comparison.
I hate to pull the race card but if RGIII was slow and white and put up identical passing numbers people would be raving about him. He’s a tall, accurate passer who set the college world on fire with his arm. 37 TD’s and 6 INT’s.
None of this matters because the Rams will trade with the Browns and we’ll never sniff the guy. But mark my words we’ll rue the day that we took Blackmon over RGIII if that actually happens.
PS I think Blackmon is a sick looking WR and he’ll tear it up in the NFL. But WR’s don’t win you superbowls when Ponder is lobbing noodles at them.
I agree.
I recall 1998 really taking off when Cunningham replaced Johnson at QB and was able to launch deep balls to Moss.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Moss is a completly different animal than Blackmon and we had neither of them on the team last year
Billick: "What did McNabb do to deserve being benched?"
Answer: He upset PETA by killing every worm he came across on a football field.
While everything you said is true.
I don’t understand your point in response to mine.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Shows how little you know about RG3 and Akili Smith
RG3 is not a one hit wonder. RG3 has started at baylor since his freshman year. Akili Smith started 11 games at Oregon.
Akili Smiths career stats: 43 TDs, 14 INT, 5,600 yards, 56% completion
RG3’s career stats: 78 TDs, 17 INTs, 10,000+ yards, 66% completion.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
By your logic
A team should pass on Luck or RGIII if they have one of the following:
-Elite QB
-Potential Elite QB
-ton of money invested in a QB
So, by your logic, the Colts should pass on Luck and RGIII, because they actually have 2 of the 3. Peyton Manning is an elite QB, who is also due a ton of money.
Take the Rams, they have Sam Bradford. He’s shown not much in 2 years, aside from being injury prone. Sure he has potential, but is he an elite prospect? It’s hard to tell, I think a case could be made that the Rams should draft Luck or RGIII based on your criteria. And that, is where I get off the bus. Common sense says, Colts draft Luck, and Rams draft Blackmon/Kalil. So, I think your criteria doesn’t seem to be working, and therefore how can you apply it to the Vikings?
Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.
Sorry to say, but that is not a really good assessment of "his logic".
nice try though.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 1:56 PM CST up reply actions
I'll elaborate
I should be more clear.
Peyton might be done. That factors in. Luck calls plays at the line in a Peytonesque way so to me it is obvious that the Colts take him there. They are a smart team.
RGIII and Luck are insanely good QB prospects. They should go #1 and #2. I fully expect the Rams to trade down and get a nice bounty for their #2 pick to build around Bradford who is an elite QB prospect. The Rams don’t want RGIII in the mix but they can trade with the Browns and still get Kalil or Blackmon.
If for some miracle RGIII is on the board when the Vikes pick, they have to take him or trade with a team that is going to take him. RGIII is crazy good. Ponder was the fourth best QB in last year’s draft and won a single game while getting hurt like 3 times. His stats were mediocre. Yes he’s just a rookie and our line sucked. But let’s not kid ourselves if you have a shot at Luck or RGIII then Ponder should NOT even factor into the decision. Worry about him later. Trade him later.
We need an elite QB if we want to ensure ourselves the best chance going forward. If we can get a great bounty for the #3 assuming a top QB is still there then I am okay with taking it. But mark my words if they pass on RGIII and go to battle with Ponder the Vikings staff will be watching RGIII play in the playoffs from their couches. The Vikings do not have a good enough defense to win with a mediocre QB and quite frankly that is what we have.
You need to understand the follwing....
If Ponder is bad enough to replace, than which team in their right mind would trade for him? How about non. So how does the logic that we can “just trade him later” actually play into anything relavent? If he is truely bad enough to be replaced on our team (a 3-13 team), why would any other team want him or give up anything to get him?
Because he's good enough to keep I'd think.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:16 PM CST up reply actions
I see your point, but it's all relative
Who is he being replaced by and who would he be replacing (on another team)? I don’t think Ponder would command a premium pick as compensation in a trade, but he might be better than other QB options out there, and so we might get something decent in return. A 1st round pick? I highly doubt it.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
I don't see your argument
If he’s so bad that 31 teams in the NFL are unwilling to give us anything decent for him, then why the hell wouldn’t we take RGIII if available and start over?
I do agree with you that we’d likely get very little for him. But the reason for that is QB’s who get hurt a lot and can’t throw downfield very well aren’t in high demand. Remember how a lot of people thought the Vikings reached for Ponder..?
I don’t see your argument
If he’s so bad that 31 teams in the NFL are unwilling to give us anything decent for him, then why the hell wouldn’t we take RGIII if available and start over?
He was saying that if you think Ponder should be replaced already in this point of his career, then there really wouldn’t even be anybody to trade him to. And if he gets alot of trade interest, then we should keep him.
I think.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:29 PM CST up reply actions
Ponder is not a big investment due to the new rookie payscale.
It was put in there so that teams would not have to be shackled by huge contracts for 1st round picks when they want to move in a nother direction.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:25 PM CST up reply actions
They are 10 or 15 slots higher than all of the other players in the draft.
So here’s your big board?
1.) Peyton Manning- Andrew Luck
2.) Cam Newton- Robert Griffen III
3-12.) Various NFL Hall of Famers
13.) Matt Kahlil
14.) Justin Blackmon
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 10:38 AM CST reply actions
They are 10 or 15 slots higher than all of the other players in the draft.
So here’s your big board?
1.) Peyton Manning- Andrew Luck
2.) Cam Newton- Robert Griffen III
3-12.) Various NFL Hall of Famers
13.) Matt Kahlil
14.) Justin Blackmon
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 10:38 AM CST reply actions
Twice for emphasis I guess…
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 10:39 AM CST up reply actions
No thanks.
OLine improvements needed to create more ‘time’ for the QB and get that 7-14 more points per game. If we have 8 picks, 5 or the majority should go to OLine. Fans have a short memory but as a reminder – NFC north is still a tough division with GB and Lions in the mix. If we cannot score against these teams, that’s 4 losses right there. Very simple. Not fixing the OLine means a pressured and frustrated development period for our QB’s. I’m not too in awe of a single break out season in college. RGIII should get more experience, pay respects to Baylor, than go for the dollar$.
Vikings in 2012 will be a Wonder-ful year. Seriously!!
I also love the game of golf. My favorite golf GPS app is OptimalClub.
It is hands down the BEST golf aid you'll ever have for club distances
under current elevation and weather conditions. Stop guessing & score low!
by VikesFanSince1967 on Jan 20, 2012 10:47 AM CST reply actions
And sticking with the 4th best QB in the division
Could just as well equal 4-6 division losses for a very long time. This is a QB driven league and if the other teams have an above average to elite QB and you don’t it is a lot harder to compete with them. OL can be had throughout the draft and one first round LT this year isn’t really going to help the rest of our sorry ass line. Build for the future and that future should have an above average/ elite QB. This might be the only opportunity to get said QB. IT WON’T HAPPEN BUT IT SHOULD.
by VikesFanInTulsa on Jan 20, 2012 12:10 PM CST up reply actions
Interesting.
I thought you thought Ponder was very good. I can’t understand that in light of the fact that you think Flacco is horrible.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
An LT
will not only help the rest of the line, but our whole offense. The Vikings won’t even Run Left Now in days. There’s a reason for that. If we had a LT we could change it up way more AND give our QB the time of day to pass. And usually pass rushers get their sacks off the edge against this team..
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:18 PM CST up reply actions
And just because Ponder is the 4th best QB in the division now....
Does not mean he will be the 4th best forever. He is only there now because he is a rookie, has no offensive line, and no legitimate receiver other than Harvin.
I dunno, flynn is also pretty good
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:43 PM CST up reply actions
You do realize Ponder had the offense moving pretty well
until he was injured
Billick: "What did McNabb do to deserve being benched?"
Answer: He upset PETA by killing every worm he came across on a football field.
Way better than McNabb
Or Favre (the majority of the year) in 2010. But that doesn’t matter, REVENGE4WEBB will point out that the injurys were his fault or some other bull..
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 21, 2012 8:08 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
The injuries are not his fault
but they still happened on basic plays too. I do not recall a play being a freak play.
Trying to brush them off like they did not happen is not realistic. Banking on him staying injury free is also myopic. There is no recent evidence that he can do it. I am sorry but it is the truth.
The dude got hurt in college and now in the NFL. I cannot put all my faith in that kind of history. It makes me worried. I do not care about why it happened or how. All I know is it happened. I also noticed that McNabb and Webb were able to withstand similar shots last year.
Apparently, that makes a person anti-Ponder. I am just trying to be objective. I am not a homer. If I was then I would want the Vikings to do whatever it takes to select Matt Kalil.
His ability to stay healthy (i.e. injury history) was mentioned in every single scouting report. Thus far it is proving to be very true.
Well,
McNabb and Webb are both bigger than Ponder overall, so it’d make since that they wouldn’t get injured as easily from blunt force. Webb only started two games last year to Ponder’s seven or eight this year though, so I don’t think that translates very well.
Here’s the kicker though, Ponder has never had a good offensive line to work behind or reliable receivers to throw to (though Rodney Smith has sort of broken out this year)…ever, which explains his injuries coming out of college. Have you watched any Florida State games this year? If so you should know what I’m talking about. It was so easy to crack the depth chart on the line that we’re starting Bobby Hart, who’s 17 years old.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 21, 2012 11:17 AM CST up reply actions
I understand that you have an endless supply of excuses so I am going to leave it alone
I think your objectivity is very suspect.
But there is no questioning his subjectivity.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:44 PM CST up reply actions
This is how skewed things have gotten
That people think they an see the difference on the field between a 12 and a 30. Absurd.
Draft position is arbitrary.
Fact is Ponder’s first year is right in line with Manning and Rodgers statistically.
Get him a stud LT and a couple new toys at WR and I promise you his numbers will markedly increase.
Ponder is great when he can stay on his spot. The problem is teams started bliztizing the bajesus out of our busted up line and forced him off his reads. That leads to happy feet, happy feet makes me a sad panda.
By the way, guess who lead the NFL in red zone passing by a good margin? Our CP7.
by Jepp The Viking on Jan 20, 2012 11:43 AM CST reply actions
Ponder is great when he can stay on his spot.
Actually, I think he’s much more impressive when on the move. In the pocket, he’s not so hot…even when given lots of time. Hopefully that will change.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
I agree,
but only because he never has a pocket to step into his throws. When you don’t have people in your face, you’re going to perform better.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 12:09 PM CST up reply actions
You must not watch the games very closely.
Ponder will run away when there isn’t a defensive player within 5 yards of him. A real qb will stand in the pocket and make it happen, not run off in a panic and cause a complete breakdown in the play.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 1:58 PM CST up reply actions
Even a "real QB" can't make
our WRs get open.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:00 PM CST up reply actions
But a real qb can make downfield and sideline throws.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:02 PM CST up reply actions
He has.
Maybe not as much as you’d like, but that’s not something that can’t improve.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:06 PM CST up reply actions
bloody hell!
the kid is a rookie, and had next to nothing to work with out there – Bradford was the number 1 pick and put up average numbers due to lack of WR’s and an OL.
Newton has pro-bowl Olinemen and Smith on the outside.
Dalton has had Green to throw to all season and didn’t have to play from behind in almost every game thanks to their D.
As for RGIII being an “elite talent”, Gabbert was a “sure fire talent” and was the worst QB.
give Ponder some weapons and protection and a full off-season with the starters, the kid will do great!
by Scottish Viking on Jan 20, 2012 2:21 PM CST via Android app up reply actions 5 recs
Android App User :)
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:23 PM CST up reply actions
Watch film of him. He is not the high caliber passer people wish him to be.
I do think he can be affective if used properly and we build a strong team, but he is not “the guy” who will make the team go, but more of a west coast qb…but he has to learn to deal with nfl pressure and not run away. That just kills the whole play design.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:29 PM CST up reply actions
Watch film of him. He is not the high caliber passer people wish him to be.
Again I can’t disagree or agree with this, but come on man he literally only had two reliable targets (Harvin and Rudolph) this season and a busted up Oline and a defense who couldn’t even get an interception or ANYTHING for that matter to give him good position to start with. We always started near the 20 every drive.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:32 PM CST up reply actions
You know...
You are not going to convince anyone that your view of Ponder is correct.
He has played 1 year. Give the guy an effing chance.
I'm fine giving him a chance. I'd start by giving him a chance to
earn the starting job in training camp. Then I’d give him a chance to show he can make improvement next year, and I’d give him a chsance to show that he is worth sticking with….but I would hand him nothing, and I won’t make excuses for his short comings.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:46 PM CST up reply actions
That's fine
but Webb was stymied by Chicago and he will be stymied by others when they plan for him. He’s Tebow with more athleticism and probably better throwing. I think the coaches know this.
No sense trying to change the subject with your speculations.
However, It would be amazing to see what Webb could do if he were given a chance to even practice at qb with something other than the scout team. He outplayed Ponder last preseason.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 6:56 PM CST up reply actions
Preseason
is not the Season. Season is when you have the starters and preseason is when you look at who is going to get cut.
Webb outplayed Ponder in the pre-season.
And the coaches didn’t even let Webb throw tha ball after he outplayed Ponder in the final game, they made him hand the ball off to Caleb King about 20 times so that his stats wouldn’t outshine their number one pick. That is something to note when taking a realistic look at the talent level of our qbs.I understand why the team was biased and gave Ponder all of the opportunity, but Webb outshined him even in the regular season. I say put them in an open competition, like the good coaches in this league do.
Make him earn it. Like any player should have to earn his spot. If he really is good, then it shouldn’t be a problem.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 8:35 PM CST up reply actions
And RG3 wouldn't have to?
I don’t much about college ball but it’s a fair bet that NFL-calibur defenses are a whole different animal than college with their blitz/coverage packages and just the phyiscal level of the players involved.
If we draft RG3 and he starts next year, he’ll have to go through a lot of the same things Ponder this year.
Wow, missed 2 words. I feel dumb
*I don’t know much about college ball
*A lot of the same things Ponder did this year.
Robert Griffin is in a different catagory of qb prospect than Ponder.
He is far more accomplished as a college qb than Ponder was.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:50 PM CST up reply actions
Except I didn't say anything about what's he accomplished
Just how he’d handle the pressure from a defense at an NFL-level.
I'm just comparing the make up of the players.
I think Griffin has a better set of qb skills to work with and it should help him a lot in the nfl. But I have no idea how he will handle nfl defensive pressure, I just know that he is a higher ranked prospect coming out of college. BTW, I haven’t called for ther vikings to draft him if he is on the board, I would rather trade down and get more top picks if given the opportunity. Too much re-building to do.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 7:00 PM CST up reply actions
catEgory...
and no, he’s not. Baylor doesn’t play the quality of opposing defense(s) that Florida State plays. Comparing Ponder’s numbers to Griffin’s is absurd. There is no “accurate” way to do it. For the record, if you had them throw routes in practice together, Griffin would look better, no argument here in that regard.
Elite > "Sure fire"
At least on my scorecard. It goes like this:
1. Once in a generation
2. Elite
3. Awe-some
4. Sweeeeeet
5. Starter quality
6. Sure fire talent (aka Something to say when the producer talks into your earpiece and says 3 seconds to commercial – other options include freezing up and giving the camera a blank stare or yelling “I can’t work under these conditions!”)
7. Serviceable
8. Knock on Wood
9. Better than a Bag of Rocks
10. His Career and Mine Are Over
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
a real QB...
…like joe Webb, presumably? You are a contradiction, sir.
I seen a few crazy throws
from Ponder when he had some time, but he also delivered big time in some of those situations.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 1:45 PM CST up reply actions
If Luck were available, I'd take him without question.
He won’t be. RGIII is a tougher call. However, I’d be very tempted to take him if Luck and Kalil are off the boards by the time we pick.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
I agree with that, more because I don't think Musgrave would know how to use Griffen effectively.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:00 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, I think Musgrave is lacking in the vision department.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:51 PM CST up reply actions
maybe under ideal situations but this is anything but ideal
Normally, I would agree with taking either one of these two although I’d lean towards RGIII because he’s a better passer and athlete than Luck (currently). But unfortunately, either of them would get killed back there UNLESS we get an OL that can protect the passer for more than a nanosecond. When the Vikings number is called and IF they consider taking RGIII, he might be in demand enough for the Vikings to talk to another team about letting go of a couple premium pass protectors in exchange for him. Otherwise, if it’s going to be thru the draft, we gotta go with other NEEDS FIRST! For the record, I’d love to have an RGII or Luck going into next year because quite frankly, Chrisitan Ponder raises just as many questions as he answers.
by jjlovesfootball on Jan 20, 2012 2:12 PM CST reply actions
I just don't consider Ponder very highly
I want the Vikings to have an elite QB and I don’t personally belive that Ponder will ever be one. If we could get a 2nd rounder for him I’d be surprised. RGIII has crazy passing skills and the Vikes would be fools not to take him if available.
We can have an elite QB
but that doesn’t mean we’ll win a Superbowl. I’d take a good QB with an Oline and defense any day over an Elite QB. -Check out GB.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:24 PM CST up reply actions
Aaron Rodgers is better than "Good"
No amount of rival vitriol will change that. He’s not the best in the league, but definitely in the top 5.
Um what?
I said Check out GB because GB has exactly what my argument was. An Elite QB with no offensive line or defense. Again I’d take a good QB with an Oline and defense over an Elite QB everyday of the week.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 21, 2012 9:14 AM CST up reply actions
Also Eli
wasn’t even considered Elite until this year… If Ponder turns out anything like Eli I’d take that.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:25 PM CST up reply actions
Eli was the top pick in the 2004 nfl draft. He was the most coveted player that year.
He wasn’t considered a reach, and was picked in front of Phillip Rivers and Ben Roethlisberger.
Ponder was considered a reach even as the 4th qb selected. Eli is an nfl passer with an nfl arm.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:33 PM CST up reply actions
Ponder has an NFL arm.
If you read his comment then mine you’d know I was referring to him saying he wanted the Vikings to have an “Elite” QB. I then went on to say that Eli wasn’t even considered elite until this year and I’d rather have a good QB, Oline, and Defense over an elite QB everyday.. That was my argument.
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:36 PM CST up reply actions
"Eli" is short for "Elite'.....har-de-har-har.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 2:43 PM CST up reply actions
I also seen that you can't spell
bELIeve without eli. lol
☠★☪Creator of http:/vikescity.info/ and dedicated DN reader.
by UnBannedVikingholic on Jan 20, 2012 2:44 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, and "SANTA" is an anagram for....."SATAN"
as in “pick six-six-six”.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 20, 2012 3:06 PM CST up reply actions
Drafting another first round QB
Is a recipe for at least two extra years if sucking (or, you know, “rebuilding”). I don’t care how good the guy is, you can’t dig a hole for yourself like that.
It won’t happen, but if it does Spielman’s term as GM will be very short indeed after we win 5 or fewer games next year while playing revolving signal callers.
here we go again
it’s like a broken record around here
"Never take your eyes off of your opponent…even when you bow."
BRAINS…BRAINS
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 4:31 PM CST up reply actions
Brains? Zombies? Oh My!

Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 20, 2012 5:02 PM CST up reply actions
The guy on the right
is Rex Grossman in about three years.
Build up your weaknesses until they become your strong points." --Knute Rockne
That it is!!!!!
Thinking of an indoctrination of my fiance on it this weekend. She hates horror flicks, but loves comedies. I think she would like it.
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 20, 2012 7:18 PM CST up reply actions
It’s not better than Hot Fuzz, but it’s ahhight : )
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 7:27 PM CST up reply actions

If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 20, 2012 7:30 PM CST up reply actions
Havent Seen Hot Fuzz
Yet
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 20, 2012 10:50 PM CST up reply actions
shaun of the dead is much better than hot fuzz.
hot fuzz is good, shaun of the dead is awesome!
by Scottish Viking on Jan 21, 2012 4:12 AM CST via Android app up reply actions
Lying Scott!!
Hot Fuzz not only has as much gore and English humor, but it has a fantastic twist ending.
Hot Fuzz > Shaun of the Dead
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jan 21, 2012 11:11 AM CST up reply actions
Eh
Not much of a gore fan, so more then likely I would be with Scottish on this one lol
Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 21, 2012 1:26 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah no kidding
Whoever first suggested this, they had no idea that they were about to open Pandora’s box
"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway
New nick-name...."Christian Pondora"
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:53 PM CST up reply actions
Offense won't operate
No matter whose behind center they aren’t going to do well, if they don’t have good offensive line in front of them. Look at the two teams in the nfc championship game, they have pretty good o-lines, solid running games, and good defenses. We have a solid running game, poor o-line, and poor defense. We can at least rectify one of those with the our first round pick whether it’s Kalil, Martin, Reiff, or Claiborne. And looking at free agency there’s no way the Saints keep Nicks, Colston, and Brees. I think we need to make a huge offer to Nicks if he’s the one to go then draft a tackle and take a guard in round 2 or 3 also to shore up our o-line. See what ponder does behind that before we give up on him. Not many qbs could have succeeded behind our o-line. I can think of maybe one. Peyton Manning.
Kurt Warner.
The guy’s release was crazy fast. I swear, sometimes the ball was snapped directly to the receiver, but on replay, you could see Warner touch it for about a quarter second.
Also: Jay Cutler. He made great strides forwards this last year as a QB. His line was arguably worse, and they really only had one weapon: Matt Forte. Even with that going against him, he posted great stats and got his team to the verge of playoff contention before injuries took them out.
Brees may have a quick enough release to avoid getting hit as well, even behind our line.
Jake Locker, even. He’s absolutely terrible when standing in the pocket, but throws insanely well when on the run. With our line, his standing in the pocket and missing horribly would be remedied quite fast.
That’s all I can think of. Locker’s a major stretch here, and Brees is a little bit of a stretch, but if Ponder could call up Kurt Warner and ask him how to do that quick pass, it would be a thing of beauty.
Warner's skill came from playing Arena League football
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Ponder has a nice release. But it's the on-field decision making that needs work.
When a quick slant or quick screen is called, Ponder makes nice throws, but when he has to sit in the pocket and scan his receivers that he seems to have the most trouble. He seems to get too worried about pressure and then tries to flee and extend the play, and often tries to force pases into coverage instead of maybe tossing the ball away.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 2:57 PM CST up reply actions
Wow a rookie needs to improve decision making?
Stop the presses!
Billick: "What did McNabb do to deserve being benched?"
Answer: He upset PETA by killing every worm he came across on a football field.
thats all well and good
but youre going to have rgiii here with no line to speak of and expect him not to suck…. thats stupid on so many levels that its laughable,
This Ponder hate irritates me big time.
The guy was a rookie. He had a OC who was in his first year here, a lockout, no offensive line, and one good receiver. Ok the guy got banged up at the end of the season, name one QB in the NFL that wouldn’t of gotten hurt taking the hits Ponder did. But after my defending of Ponder, if Luck was there I’d take him no questions asked. I watched him 6 or 7 times this year and I was blown away by what he did with no receivers.
by Dodger48 on Jan 20, 2012 10:39 PM CST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
The Ponder hate is downright pathologic by a select few
Give the kid an OL and receivers like Brees and Stafford had during the playoff game and he can dice up any defense. This is beyond absurd with these kind of posts and comments.
God I am so sick of this
Ho many times has post like this has been made in the past several months
"Never take your eyes off of your opponent…even when you bow."
Unfortunately there'll be a lot more of them coming.
Nobody’s seen enough of Ponder to accurately predict whether he’ll be great, terrible, or average yet. They’ll die down a bit after the draft and then start up again in training camp and probably continue for most of next season.
by CanadianViking on Jan 21, 2012 2:11 AM CST up reply actions
That is what we are suppose to do
No position on the team is safe. And why should it be? Rookie or not.
The simple fact is when you are picking #3 you have to take a hard look at all the potential candidates to select there.
RG3 happens to be one of them. It is a very good discussion.
Ponder has done nothing to ease the injury concerns that every scout had about him coming out of college and he was just OK last year. That part is OK and to be expected. But he is not a sure thing that is for dang sure.
What is worse for me is the closed mindedness of some people who thinks he deserves the job just because the Vikings used the #12 pick on him. He should compete for the job each and every year. And if the team feels that they cannot trust him to stay healthy then they need to look at all their options. At the end of the year there were some calling for an open competition for Webb and Ponder this upcoming season. His supporters think that is foolish. I say hogwash. Every player should have to perform at a high level in order to start. Ponder is no guarantee. The only reasonable bet I would make is that he will get hurt yet again next year for the 4th year in a row.
Matt Leinart went higher and is considered a bust. Similar first year stats too.
Every player that the Vikings may select at #3 deserves discussion. This one is just one that is a lightning rod for this board. I love it myself.
I agree with everything you said and even though I find much of the Ponder debate repetitive I keep commenting on it : )
Spielman and Ponder have made it pretty clear that the Vikings aren’t going to draft a QB in the 1st this year which isn’t overly surprising, but I’m a little concerned that our GM would make a decision like that before he’s even fully scouted this years QB class. I guess that’s a pride thing for him but it doesn’t fit with his “nothing is off the table” statement. I’ve got my concerns about Ponder as well and think he’s got a lot to prove this coming season and hope that he at least beats out Webb in a competition before they name him the starter.
I’m not going to write him off but calling him a “franchise QB” is premature at this point and I agree with you that the Vikings aren’t doing their jobs if they ignore prospects like RG3 and Luck when they’re drafting this high. Carolina went with Newton after seeing Clausen for 1 year, and Cleveland wants RG3 after Colt McCoy had a couple of decent seasons, so I don’t see why the Vikings wouldn’t consider a QB if there’s a potential upgrade available to them. Good call on the Leinart example as his first year stats are very similar to Ponder’s. I was actually planning on using Leinart’s rookie stat-line the next time someone compared Ponder’s stats to Peyton’s rookie #s but you beat me to it!
by CanadianViking on Jan 21, 2012 11:08 AM CST up reply actions
While I didn't like that Spielman announced Ponder as the starter right off the bat,
I don’t think that was necessarily bad. I can see a few justifications for making that type of statement.
First, he is showing confidence in his own player selection, otherwise there would immediately be a media debate over who the starting qb should be, and that could undermine the credibility he needs to cultivate.
Second, he is sending a signal that he is going to be looking at other glaring positional needs for the team, and this also deflects attention away from the whole qb issue. Also, this should nurture Ponders confidence, which may have taken a bit of a blow over the final weeks of the season. Nothing wrong with that.
Third, what he says and what he does or actually thinks can be very different things. I believe he wants to give Ponder the shot to make it, but at the same time, I hope he is serious about honestly evaluating his performance and tendencies. Either way, we need to give the roster a make-over, and that needs a lot of attention.
Also, I think the fact that Clausen and McCoy went in the second and third rounds of their draft class makes it a lot easier for those teams to move in another direction more quickly than if they were first round picks. And, I think the fact that the new rookie wage scales mean that Ponder is actually not a real financial investment will make it easier for the team to move in another direction sooner than later if they choose to.
You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask of the Spiderman
And you don't trash talk about him
by REVENGE4WEBB on Jan 21, 2012 3:08 PM CST up reply actions
You are misinterpreting
It’s not that he deserves he job. It’s that you can’t field a team of all QBs, and picking another one in the first round means paying short shrift to the rest of the team.
Ponder may or may not e d up being guy. Same for Webb. We’ll know more after they’ve had a chance to develop more. If they fail, then we can think of upgrading at QB. But now is not the time.
This is true
at the same time though, the Vikings may never be in this position again.
To be honest, I am not sold on Webb either. I think Chicago played him all teams would play him and that is slow down their rush, spy him, and make him beat them from the pocket. He has a long ways to go IMO. I think he should stay at QB but I need to see more passing from within the pocket from Webb before I can feel comfortable with him starting.
So that leaves with two young QBs that no one knows if they will pan out. What happens if Ponder is hurt again and Webb does not do well?
The Vikings need to do just like they did with AP. Take the BPA. Period.
Everything else will work itself out. And the Vikings could end up getting a nice little haul for Ponder if they decide to move him later. Or RG3 for that matter.
Nothing wrong with having 3 young QBs from which to choose the QBOTF.
But I am crazy like that too. :)
I didn't like hearing Ponder make the statement on radio about Spielman's comments to him
I would hope the team evaluates every position in this draft – picking #3 hopefully won’t come around any time soon, and while very good QB’s can be taken beyond the first round, many are also taken quite high.
I think RGIII should be given a long and critical look because if you think he has the potential to be substantially better then Ponder, then you better think long and hard before passing on him if given the chance.
I don’t think they will go this route, but I hope it’s because they have taken the time to fully assess RGIII, not because they took Ponder last year and feel they need to stand behind him.
Personally I hope they take Kalil, but I would be somewhat excited about RGIII because he could be an upper tier QB (one trully won’t know until he’s been in the league for a few years – the same holds true for Ponder).
Rapunzel, Rapunzel!

Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!
by VikesFaninNM on Jan 21, 2012 1:32 PM CST up reply actions

by 






















