Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

A Thought On Discussing The Inevitable Discussion: Peyton Manning- Part Tres

This will in all likelihood be the final installment of the running story RE Peyton Manning, as the cold hard reality is he is likely to end up with another team here shortly- Arizona, Miami*, Washington**, New York Jets, Tennessee*** are all strong candidates- but, hey, since we're free to speculate now without running afoul of NFL tampering laws, let's give it just one more go for ol' times sake.

*My money is on Miami- Peyton vs. Tom Brady twice a season, giving Manning at least the opportunity to really solidify himself as the better of the two, something we all know he wants. **Conversely, Peyton vs. Eli twice a season doesn't strike me as something Peyton would look forward to. ***Tennessee would be the ‘Brett Favre' move for him, but seeing the teary-eyed joint press conference today, I have a bit of a feeling that Peyton doesn't have enough acrimony towards Indy to make this move.

Just as before, I've re-edited this story, placing the original parts after the jump, with the dates of the info on the top to keep things clear. But before making said leap of faith, let's review one other important piece of information here, aside of course from the fact that Manning's FA status is actually factually official now- the video that appears to show Manning throwing deep, and throwing deep well. It certainly seems to be a key indicator that Manning may actually have enough of his arm strength back to be the perennial contender he once was, and if that's true, then this is a guy who could potentially take a strong enough team to multiple Super Bowls within the next 4-5 years. Of course, are the Vikings that strong enough of a team? As many have pointed out, there's a gulf of difference between us and our 2008/ 2009 incarnation, when all it took was a great QB to make us the best team in the NFL.

And of course, as Eric pointed out earlier, the apparent interest in bringing back one Mr. Sage Rosencopter Rosenfels would certainly seem to rule us out- having three QBs is often one more than many an NFL team; having four is almost (almost) unheard of.

So again, as before, feel free to re-read past thoughts on this, or just jump straight to the comments and pick it all back up where we last left off. Also, if you actually haven't voted in the poll yet, now would be the time.

Okeedokee, let's do this. LEAP OF FAITH!

Star-divide

Semi-Original Story Lines: February 7th, 2012

Since we last discussed the inevitable discussion, there have of course been some interesting developments. The biggest of course is that Peyton Manning's doctors have cleared him to play, but Jim Irsay has said that the Colt's doctors have not.

There are two ways (at least) to see this information. One, Peyton Manning really isn't ready to play yet, but he got some ‘friendly doctors' to say so. Of course, when it comes to medical stuff, it's never as cut and dried as we'd all love to believe- hence the whole ‘second opinion' thing that exists in the medical community. The second possibility here, and I've got to give credit to my grandmother for thinking this one right off the bat before I had even considered it, is that Irsay is making sure he's got a good reason to either cut or trade Manning. Despite the fact that Indy's getting Lucky, there's no denying Manning's impact on that franchise and that city, and his popularity amongst the fans is extreme. Even if it is the logical decision to do so, Irsay may face major fall-out from the fan base for cutting Manning just to move on- hence his desire to have a good reason to do so.

Either way, it is almost a near certainty that Manning will not be a Colt for much longer. Whether he will be an outright free agent, or potential trade bait prior to March (when the Colts will owe him his big bonus), is a different story entirely. My money is on Irsay swinging a trade- he could easily net at least a first rounder plus some for Manning, and for a team that's rebuilding, that's by and far the smart route to go. Edit: Clearly I was wrong. However, Peyton Manning is a unique player in many capacities, and he is one of the few who could essentially determine his own future. If Irsay were to set up a trade for a team that Manning has no interest in playing for, don't count out his ability to block it himself.

Furthermore, rumblings are that the Tennessee Titans fan base has already started a little grass-roots movement to get Manning. There are a few things to mention on this front, as it's very interesting to me. First off, I can't imagine Irsay would trade Manning inter-divisionally; that would be suicide in many senses. Conversely, Manning would likely love to play for the Titans, because a.) they are a good team with a good O-line that he could easily take into at least a few deep playoff runs, and b.) he could totally Favre the crap outta Indy for at least a year or two by doing so. Now mind you, this whole ‘get Manning' thing is a fan movement, and the team itself has said nothing- but it is equally important to remember that teams are not allowed to talk about any real desire to get Manning outside of the vaguest hypotheticals, because as Manning is still a Colt, it could violate league tampering laws. One would think the Titans would be interested in him, but there's no guarantees.

So, Viking fans, let's continue this discussion. Two (edit: now just one) thoughts to ponder here, as well as continuing to discuss the topics brought up originally below. Thought the first- if Manning were to be put on the trade circuit, should the Vikings make an offer, and how much? For a rebuilding team, trading away first round picks is not an ideal thing, to be sure, but would a player of Peyton Manning's caliber make that a rule to break? And secondly only, let's continue a discussion that was brought up in the comments from our first round- what are the odds Manning, should he be a free agent with his own fate in his hands, would be interested in joining the Purple Pride? What would we, what could we, offer him to make it an "offer he couldn't refuse"? (Or, of course, should we offer anything at all?)

Original Story Lines- January 30th, 2012

OK- so let's get to it. Peyton Manning, arguably at least the greatest QB of this generation, is looking more and more certain to become a completely unrestricted free agent in the near future, likely in early March. Of course, we could all be thrown for a loop and have the Colts decide to retain him and either draft/ not draft Andrew Luck regardless (although the Colts have openly state they intend to take Luck), but signs are pointing more and more towards Manning's time in Indy being over, with the public spat between him and owner Jim Irsay being perhaps the biggest indication.

For quite a few NFL teams, this leads therefore to the big question- to get Manning, or not to get Manning. Currently the two biggest names floated out there for said pick-up would be the Miami Dolphins and the New York Jets, although much of this is still all speculation, as you can't really do anything more than that while Manning still is with the Colts, and while his health still does remain uncertain.

And while the Vikings have not said anything either way, I know the question would of course come up for us. I knew before I even wrote this that the first two reactions would be a.) "OMG PEYTON MANNING! GETHIMGETHIMGETHIM!!!!!", and b.) "OMG NOT ANOTHER OLD QB NONONONONO!!!!". Both reactions, while knee-jerk in nature, are quite valid. Peyton Manning is, after all, Peyton Manning- he's a guy who can QB you right to the Super Bowl. Conversely, he is older now, has recently had serious health issues with his longevity on the field put to serious question, and Viking fans are, by and large, sick and tired of the ‘old QB carousel' that has happened in Minnesota, with Brett Favre's 2009 miracle being really the only positive during that time. (Edit on that thought- re-reading it, I have no clue how I didn't count the 1998 season with Randall Cunningham in that; as much as it's remembered as ‘Randy Moss' Rookie Year', Cunningham certainly deserves considerable credit.)

But there are more layers to this onion than just those two obvious thoughts. What about Christian Ponder? What about Joe Webb? Is adding a veteran QB- granted, one, who if healthy, probably has about 4 more years of very high-level play still left in his tank- entirely a wise move with our current QB situation? Would Manning accept being our lead QB all while also playing mentor to two potential starters down the road? And what of said two potential starters- after battling for the #1 spot, with the word being that battle would continue in the coming season's training camp (and likely right through pre-season), would they be OK with that battle immediately becoming for the #2 spot, a la what happened to T-Jack when Favre came to town? Is our team good enough right now for immediate Super Bowl runs, even with Manning the magnificent behind center? Is Manning healthy enough to survive behind our O-line, which, even should we get Matt Kalil, is likely to still be at best league average in 2012? And what of the salary cap- is it financially feasible for us to have such a surely expensive player on the roster?

Discuss all below!

Poll
Peyton Manning as a Viking. Yes or No? (Be careful, you can't change your mind later!!!)
Let's do this. Super Bowl!
630 votes
No way. Not worth it.
1249 votes

1879 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 158 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Not enough cap room

We would have to take his current contract, which is huge. Would put too much of a limit on who we could pursue in free agency

"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway

by Grape Drank on Jan 30, 2012 1:22 PM CST reply actions  

Not to mention

How there are many people who think he will never play football again, too much uncertainty. Something we really do not need right now

"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway

by Grape Drank on Jan 30, 2012 1:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course

if he’s not healthy, or if there’s significant room for uncertainity, it’s not much of a question anymore. That’s why this is going to be a ‘running story’, as details are constantly coming fast and hard about the situation. After all, I could look really stupid in a week or two when the Colts suddenly up and pick up his bonus and keep him.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 1:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Even if he's healthy..

it’s just a matter of time, It is believed that he has a degenerative bone issue with his neck, the degenerative bone issue is a family trait, this is why his older brother never made it to the pros.

Besides it will take him and Musgrave a whole season just to get to know each other. And as mentioned above if we sign him we probably wont be able to afford decent blockers for him.

by midnightwonder on Jan 30, 2012 5:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Colts TEAM doctors cleared him to play...

as well as an independent doctor. His nerve may not be up to par by training camp but his neck itself is ok to go. Colts will opt not to implement his contract, not trade him. Even though they would get something, they are not going to sign him for guaranteed $28 million which he could take, then sit out if he didn’t like the trade and then they have nothing for the money. Plus the headaches and bad pr surrounding possible trades going back and forth for months.

by Los Diablo on Feb 8, 2012 12:06 PM CST up reply actions  

There's no guarantee we have to pick up his contract, he very well could be an unrestricted FA

Not saying that I want to pursue him though. Gotta give it to him, he’s an amazing competitor, makes everyone around him better and best of all he’s a team player. If I were Jim Irsay I would resign Peyton, pick Luck, and have him sit a year then raffle off Peyton to the highest bidder(and then face the wrath of the whole fanbase for ridding them of their far and away biggest fan favorite). Also Peyton has made more money in his life off of endorements than he will ever spend, much less his contracts. In all rights he could sign for a small contract to a different team so they can be more competitive in Free Agency.

Wherever he goes I wish him the best of luck and a speedy recovery.

by nmatt71 on Jan 30, 2012 1:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Grandma's Thoughts

Brilliant grandma, great critical thinking….however this requires no brains whatsoever. There are 28 MILLION reasons not to keep a potentially flawed QB. End of story.

by Day1VikesFan on Feb 8, 2012 12:40 PM CST up reply actions  

To be fair

I had just heard the news, and she had heard it earlier. She had more of a chance to think about it.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 8, 2012 7:27 PM CST up reply actions  

We wouldn't actually have to pick up his contract per se.

He would be a UFA, the previous contract with the Colts wouldn’t stand. However, we would of course likely have to AT LEAST come close to it to land him.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe, maybe not

Depends on what people around the league think of his recovery.

by amiller92 on Jan 30, 2012 2:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep.

Of course, if it’s a big question, I personally wouldn’t be a fan of the Vikings taking the gamble. Granted, if it works out we’re geniuses, but still- if it doesn’t, that could be a HUGE setback in terms of the rebuilding phase.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 2:26 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not sure I see the setback

If he’s an unrestricted free agent, aren’t we only out money? And I guess game experience for Ponder for whatever period of time Manning plays, but that’s partially offset by having more time to learn and being around Manning as a mentor.

by amiller92 on Jan 30, 2012 2:59 PM CST up reply actions  

That's the big setback right there.

The eaten-up salary cap room. It would prohibit us from picking up other FAs who might stick around longer and be a big part of our rebuilding period. Remember, guys like Winfield and Jared Allen came to us that way and have become major parts of our team for long periods- in rebuilding, you typically look for guys like that, not 2-3 year stop gaps. Then again, Peyton Manning stands alone in that regard… he could well be worth it, rebuilding or not.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:29 PM CST up reply actions  

We will not take on his current contract!!!

He will be released, making him an Unrestricted Free Agent! Meaning his current contract is void! Payton wouldn’t come here anyway, we are not close to contending for a Super Bowl.

by FLSKOLMAN on Feb 7, 2012 3:50 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Nope

The team is in need of an overhaul, youth movement, whatever you want to call it. Time to stop kidding ourselves, this team is no longer a Peyton Manning away from a Super Bowl. With such gaping holes at OL, WR, DB, and (hopefully not) RB, the Vikings are in no position to get #18.

"Believe in the system. For it shall bring light when there is dark, food when there is hunger, and shots when there are passes. This is the divine process." Yeo 4:18

by NorthernStar on Jan 30, 2012 1:29 PM CST reply actions  

Agreed

but it’s fun to fantasize about Peyton in Purple.

by a951racer on Jan 30, 2012 4:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Really? She's not wearing anything in mine

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Feb 7, 2012 12:57 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Beil > Alba

If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).

by Alittlemore_cowbell on Feb 7, 2012 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

My Fantasy is !!!

Jessica Biel and Jessica Alba body painted in purple !!!

by MexiVike on Feb 7, 2012 2:14 PM CST up reply actions  

In honor of Allen

Both Jessicas with the painted number 69

by MexiVike on Feb 7, 2012 2:16 PM CST up reply actions  

That's hilarious

Alba > Biel and it’s not even remotely close. Biel has never done anything for me.

Christian Ponder: Super Bowl 50 MVP for the Minnesota Vikings
For Basketball Reasons

by Td1984 on Feb 7, 2012 5:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Thank you

Although if I had my druthers it would be the three Jessicas…. Can’t go wrong with that… Alba, Biel, Simpson. Have to have Simpson so every one else can feel good about themselves.

The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.

by Grime on Feb 8, 2012 7:16 AM CST up reply actions  

too Risky

I voted no for three reasons
A) i do not feel confident about his neck
B) Too expensive and not enough cap room
C ) will affect the development of Ponder and Webb

by MexiVike on Jan 30, 2012 1:30 PM CST reply actions  

Just as a counter-point

and I’m nowhere near having my own opinion set, mind you, but-

1.) IF Manning is healthy (let’s run with that assumption from here on out), he could provide a great source of guidance for Ponder and/or Webb. They’d be learning from the Yoda of QBs.
2.) Manning has shown, if nothing else than through this season without him, that he is a truly unique player- in a team sport, he is capable of doing SO much alone. His quick release can make a porous O-line look solid, his accuracy can make second-rate WRs look great, and his ability to consistently score can relieve pressure on the defense.
3.) Manning doesn’t need to take us to the Super Bowl in 2012. Again if healthy, he’s likely got 4 years left in the tank. Of course, whether we should play him for a full 4 years and risk letting Ponder/ Webb walk during that time of course would become a big part of this- but hey, Rodgers sat behind Favre for an eternity.

Again, just playing devil’s advocate right now.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 2:01 PM CST up reply actions  

to counter that

1. If we want someone to mentor Ponder and Webb then we hire him as a QB coach.

2. Look at his back up do we think he learned so much from Manning that their offense didn’t miss a beat. M Harrison said it best when asked about Peyton’s replacement. He said that during presnap he would read the defense and be like “Peyton would audible out right now into something else”.

This is a very difficult thing to teach, this is the greatness of Peyton he is very cerebal and knows which plays in his offense will but the current defensive play called.

by midnightwonder on Jan 30, 2012 6:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't buy any of those counter arguments

Devil’s advocate aside, I’d rather have Ponder/Webb learn from the coaches and by doing, than by sitting and watching. If we assume Manning is healthy? Then sure, he’d be an upgrade right now, even if he has maybe 4 years left. But, the temporary upgrade now, would leave us in the exact same hole we’re in now, just 4 years later. If we develop Ponder/Webb over that same time frame, we’ll be set for the next decade.

Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.

by CCNorsemen on Jan 30, 2012 7:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, if he's healthy and has 4-years left in the tank

I don’t know how you don’t go out and get him. 4 years is enough time to build the team back up. That’s a no-brainer.

The problem is, it isn’t that simple. If only it were.

by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 30, 2012 8:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Good statement of our situation.

With 2 young QBs and new receivers, developing timing and rapport are very important. Having them all develop together should make us much stronger each year.

The NDSU Bison rock.

by berserkerND on Jan 30, 2012 6:19 PM CST up reply actions  

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

and a thousand times NO! I have been a Vikings faithful since I was in grade school and I am tired of seeing us pony around 30 something QBs in hopes of winning it. You know what wins Superbowls? Talent and youth, We need to focus on acquiring a whole s**t ton more of that and focus on rebuilding. Will it be a miserable process? YES it will be, but all in all we will see much more fruitful seasons from it come a few years down the road. Why can’t Viking fans just let the team rebuild instead of a new Flavor of the month rumor coming around and every fan clamoring for it? I hope that Manning either A) retires before doing further damage, or B) Has a good few years enjoying the game but not under center for Minnesota.. Unless he wants to be or OC or QB Coach.

by Ponderftw on Jan 30, 2012 1:33 PM CST reply actions  

Manning is smarter than that

Take one look at our line, even with Kalil, and he’s sure to tell his agent forget about the Vikings.

by newps on Jan 30, 2012 1:53 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

In all likelihood

you’d be right. There will be plenty of ‘stronger’ teams in the mix. But let’s just say…

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 2:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Depends on the price

I really would love to have him around as a mentor for Ponder and Webb, and would enjoy watching him for a season or two.

But he’s likely too expensive to be worthwhile for that limited role.

by amiller92 on Jan 30, 2012 2:06 PM CST reply actions  

Arguably perhaps the biggest point against this.

His health aside of course. Like I posted above, if his health is solid, there’s going to be a monsterous bidding war for his services. While Mark has pointed out that we would have a good amount of salary cap room going into 2012, I’m not sure it’s wise to practically tie it ALL up on just one player- but if we were, Peyton Manning would be the one guy in existence arguably worth it.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 2:27 PM CST up reply actions  

IF he were healthy enough,

IF he didn’t cost too much,
IF his signing didn’t stop up from picking up all the other pieces that we need,
IF it for a cap friendly year or two……

Then MAYBE start thinking about it.

by socalminfan on Jan 30, 2012 2:31 PM CST reply actions  

Wow

with all those ifs, you’d only MAYBE think about it? If all those ifs were filled for me, I’d be writing letters to Wilf and Frazier.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Then I would see if he is a good fit for us.

Would he hold back or help our two young QBOTFs?
Would he be in conflict with the OC and HC on how to run the offense?
Once I know he is healthy and affordable then I would start to ‘think about’ if he was a good fit or not.

by socalminfan on Jan 31, 2012 2:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh Christ

I was hoping this would have gone away after the post on the subject the other day…. BAH HAHAHAHAHAHA

Yeah Right.

Is adding a veteran QB- granted, one, who if healthy, probably has about 4 more years of very high-level play still left in his tank- entirely a wise move with our current QB situation?”

No. Unlike a few years ago, we have two very viable QB’s that have proven they can lead the team, when the team is healthy. Of course, with T-Joke, we didn’t have that and Rosenfels never got the chance to sink or swim. Also, this team, in 2 short seasons, is nothing like it was in 2009. Manning would be slaughtered and given his recent injuries, would almost be garuanteed a career ender. In this case, even if he came at a bargin price, he stil isn’t worth the money. We need an O-line and Def. Secondary. We don’t need nor have the ability for another “Mentor”.

probably has about 4 more years of very high-level play still left in his tank

Since you brought up the Favre comparison in some respects, let’s look at that. Again, This is not a T-Joke needing to be tutored. We have the young QB’s who have the ability to be go getters and think on the feet. Alot of team would love to have one, let alone two, young QB’s with franchise possibilites.

Also, as for possibly 4 years left IF he is able to come back let alone match what he was before, you have to take that with a grain of salt. In the last 6 seasons of Favre’s career, he only had 2 winning seasons. Last one with the Packers, and the first with us. Other then that, they resemble someone who should have retired a few years before and definate down swing and who’s “tank” was sucking fumes. Now, Manning hasn’t had a losing season sine 2001 I believe, however, you look at his last several seasons before the injury, and you see a slow rise in INT’s and a slight up and down the last few seasons he has played. Yes, Some could be attributed to WR core not being the greatest, but Favre made our’s look stellar. But at times still looked shakey. So while Manning may have a few years left, and if he was as before, whose to say he wont start getting more erratic in a few years as well? And, like Favre, he has been known to to force things to be the “Hero”.

Could he get us back to the NFCCG? Maybe, a BIG maybe, but unlike a few years ago, highly doubtful. We need to solidify our line and Defense. And with drafting and possibly free agents, we need as much money to accomplish that for a braod range of players, not another single person stop gap that may or may not work at all.

Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!

by VikesFaninNM on Jan 30, 2012 2:34 PM CST reply actions  

I wouldn't compare Favre with Manning.

It’s apples to oranges at the end of the day, really. Yes they’re both QBs, yes both HoF bound, but that’s about it. Their playing styles are remarkably different- and I don’t think I fully agree with you when you say that Manning has a Favre-ish tendency to force things. I only see him do that in desperate situations, when it’s pretty much got to be done anyways. Otherwise, he’s generally far more careful with the ball.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Styles Yes

were different, but yet, both had the same capabilities, when healthy, of carrying a team, with enough talent andhealth, to a Superbowl. So while different, in a way, they were the same in that regard. And yes, Manning has been more careful then Favre in general, but there were a few times, and I’ll be danged if I’d be able to tell which games, that he seemed to push things a little too much. So yes, I do believe you can compare each other as well as not compare each other to certain extents.

Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!

by VikesFaninNM on Jan 30, 2012 4:54 PM CST up reply actions  

But whether or not

either one of us is right or wrong, and for both of us, it is both, we are more then set and capable for the future. And that is what this team is working for. It going to be about 2 years before we come above half way of where we were in ‘09. We can’t stop and think about the now and a now with Manning. Hate to say, there is no now. Even with Manning 100% healthy, he won’t be able to do it all alone.

Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!

by VikesFaninNM on Jan 30, 2012 4:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope and it's for a good reason too

the kids!

Seriously though I think there are two ways teams in the NFL build themselves. The first is a quick fix you patch up holes with FA signings and solid rookie talent. You don’t really invest a whole lot in development as you can always pick up someone better in FA. Not necessarily true but these teams seem to always want at least a play off spot and often this is the only thing they get out of it. The other way is the slow burn, teams spend a lot of time on the draft working their base level of skill up over time. Then when they have a high base they pick up a FA or two and swap that around year to year, keeping a solid core but working on for consistency instead of the home run.

Hrm there’s a baseball analogy all set up. So do you take the guy that can get you on base every time or the guy who has a chance to slug it out of the park? I personally will take the base hitter. Teams that try for the gold tend to be the Cowboys, Vikes, Redskins they tend to try and get past the basics with a little bit of money. The problem is the NFL is just to random to ever be predictable. You can have the best team in the nation and still fail with a single injury, bad call or heck a bad game. Meanwhile the teams that work the slow burn tend to hover around the play offs every season giving themselves more chances for the gold. Honestly, I don’t think anyone can say that luck and chance don’t play at least some role in a super bowl season.

So I would rather not pick up some crazy expensive FA, I would rather increase the median skill level of the team and try to have a team that can hold together for the long run and make multiple play off shots, and one day bring home the big enchilada.

The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.

by Grime on Jan 30, 2012 2:43 PM CST reply actions  

Damn.

How did I not think of the children?!

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:42 PM CST up reply actions  

man all that types and you only got children out of it.

Not sure what this says. :p

The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.

by Grime on Jan 31, 2012 7:45 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm undecided...my thoughts

Not knowing about his health…sign him for a contract that states that if he is unhealthy that he will then become qb coach or assistant qb coach. That way, any money we pay him, should he not be able to play could then be taken away from the salary cap issue…and he still gets paid. Also, his knowledge of other defenses is what makes him great. Physically, Manning was never anything special, it’s been his brain that has dissected defenses, not his speed, agility, arm strength, leg strength, etc.

Development of Ponder and Webb I think would only be enriched by talking to and absorbing from this qb guru. Sure, playing time would be scarce for them, but let them train under Manning. As for Webb, you could use him at WR, BUT ONLY IF YOU THROW TO HIM ONCE IN A WHILE!!

Our O-line will still be an issue, as will our secondary and wide receivers. With that, I don’t think we will see the NFC Championship Game, let alone a Super Bowl. However, the idea that our O-line will be league average with Kalil is promising, as Manning never has had a great O-line (particularly against the run) and I would suggest that it certainly is an idea worth looking into.

I don’t think he will be the Purple Savior, nor do I think he will want to come here, but if he does, I don’t think we can just tell him to play somewhere else. Certainly there will be hypocrites that suggest the Colts are just wrong should they let him go, suggesting that anyone else should be happy with him, but then suggest that the Vikings shouldn’t bring him in.

by Chris3 on Jan 30, 2012 2:52 PM CST reply actions  

Difference between Colts keeping/ release Manning...

compared to us picking him up can be summed up in two words: Andrew Luck. Ponder might be the future, or even Webb, but have shown they do need some more development. Be it on the field or under a mentor a la Manning, neither would likely rival Luck’s abilities, success or stats this coming season, even as second and third year QBs, respectively.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I meant

that people seem to think that it is disrespectful, wrong and rude to let Manning go due to Andrew Luck….that any other team would be dumb not to get Manning…then those same people suggest that the Vikings shouldn’t get Manning.

I agree that Luck makes the difference here…that he is probably better than Webb or Ponder…but to suggest that the Vikings shouldn’t be interested in Manning I don’t think is rational. It boils down to this argument: Why have great talent (Manning) when you can have “good enough” talent that might develop into something better, but not as good as Manning?

by Chris3 on Jan 30, 2012 5:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Peyton is at is best

with an offense he can fit in and has been working with his team.

It’s taken years to build an offense around Peyton. He routinely did snaps in gaelic.

Peyton fits in Indy, who understands him. Any place else is a crash and burn.
It takes time to re-establish timing and adjust to different receivers. It could be a 2-3 year project before playing at a high level again.

Not a chance with the Vikings. Peyton never needs to play another down and become first ballot HOF. This is one unfortunate-effect of the lockout, where the NFL prohibited Peyton having access to trainers and medical support through this recovery.

For one, this Peyton talk has to cease until March 1st. It is news hype and does not need the prime time media airtime until a week prior to actual decision time.

Vikings in 2012 will be a Wonder-ful year. Seriously!!
I also love the game of golf. My favorite golf GPS app is OptimalClub.
It is hands down the BEST golf aid you'll ever have for club distances
under current elevation and weather conditions. Stop guessing & score low!

by VikesFanSince1967 on Jan 30, 2012 2:52 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

I think Peyton is the kind of player to host his own

offseason workouts….and any receiver that doesn’t want to attend should be on the practice squad….especially any of Minnesota’s current receivers.

by Chris3 on Jan 30, 2012 2:54 PM CST up reply actions  

like ponder tried to do

But all of 3 people went

by Lunchpail on Jan 30, 2012 3:31 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Ponder didn't really equal Manning.

Not that I wasn’t dissapointed more didn’t show up, but still. It’s more understandable.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Peyton built that offense, and rather quickly.

His first season wasn’t a pretty one in terms of W-L, but immediately afterwards he became the Manning we know as a legend. I doubt he’d have a hard time building this offense right around himself too.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I think I heard Dungy say:

If Peyton is not a Colt, he will not play. He will not play for any other franchise!

by izziefans on Jan 30, 2012 3:23 PM CST reply actions  

Good point

Prediction:
Irsay passes on the bonus.
Peyton remains loyal to Indy.
Peyton commits to a 1-2 year development with Indy so Irsay can have a more informed evaluation alongside Luck in development.
Irsay gets the best of both worlds. Indy fans are happy.
If peyton cannot play to former capabilities, he can leave the game on his own terms with the Colts with no major damage to his reputation.

Precedent… Brady was out with a knee issue. Cassel steps up. Cassel leads to a solid season. Patriots see Brady returning to form. Patriots trade cassel away for draft pick (or a player + draftpick combo – not sure which). Brady returns commitment back to Patriots organization.

A neck issue is a different matter. Will peyton return to previous form? A full offseason, training camps, etc creates a lot of unknowns. Staying with Indy in a development & rehab capacity makes the most sense. There’s a lot of familiar variables (dr’s, conditioning staff, playbook). Best remain in familiar comfort zone. When it comes to a decision point – it will be clear who’s ready to take the reins of the ‘horseshoe’.

Vikings in 2012 will be a Wonder-ful year. Seriously!!
I also love the game of golf. My favorite golf GPS app is OptimalClub.
It is hands down the BEST golf aid you'll ever have for club distances
under current elevation and weather conditions. Stop guessing & score low!

by VikesFanSince1967 on Jan 30, 2012 3:43 PM CST up reply actions  

One thing about the neck injury-

Manning has undergone some unique treatments, including stem cell. Now, I obviously haven’t a clue if any of that means a thing. BUT, there is the possibility he could rebound 100%. No one knows right now how close he is/ isn’t to that (I’m not sure Manning himself knows that right now), so it does remain to be seen.

Again, if he were to only be 50%, or at a high risk of re-injury, I’m firmly in the ‘no’ category.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I heard that a while back too, but-

now we have sniping between him and Irsay, and he seems less than pleased overall. I don’t think that not being a Colt will force his retirement hand at this point. Only his health. In fact, if he truly feels burned and angry at Irsay at the end of this, he may actually want revenge- weird as it sounds.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Then you could chalk him up for the Titans

So he could go all Brett Favre on their asses and burn them twice a season for the next few years. Assuming he’s healthy.

by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 30, 2012 8:18 PM CST up reply actions  

meh

i guess if we get him i wont complain. but i wont be pulling for spielman to get him. manning/ponder isnt like favre/t-jack, tarvaris eas doomed from the beggining, he lacked talent. ponders main flaw right now is throwing bad interceptions, something peyton (deffinetly not brett) could help him with. also, peyton has atleast 4 more years left, brett had at BEST 2 more years, and in reality he only had one. also if peyton comes here a reciever like reggie wayne might want to come here too.

by statue_left on Jan 30, 2012 3:54 PM CST via iPhone app reply actions   1 recs

Again

Manning’s fast release and quick decision making ability easily masks that. If you want proof, look no further than our own one Mr. Charlie Johnson. Guess who that train wreck was playing LT for before us? Manning didn’t die then.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd say Indy's O-line is better than our's overall though

even with Charlie Johnson at LT. I’d certainly take Jeff Saturday over Sullivan. While I’m not sure who else they have on that line, it’ll be hard pressed to be worse than our aging-injured Hutch/Herrera and the ineffective passblock of Loadholt.

by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 30, 2012 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

If Manning....

…. has team choices that include Miami and NYJ, I don’t see why he would consider the Vikings. We lack quality depth in too many areas and we don’t even know if we’re getting AD 1.0 back. I’d like to see Peyton with the Vikings and he’d bring us up a notch, but it wouldn’t be like Favre in ’09. CP7 and Webb can rest easy, I think.

by Vrooman on Jan 30, 2012 4:19 PM CST reply actions  

I agree with that.

And there’s really no counterpoint. It’s not like in 2009 when we got Favre- we were widely viewed at that time as a Super Bowl team, just without a QB. And they were (largely) right in that assumption. Now it’s not so much.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Jan 30, 2012 4:40 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't see NYJ dumping their poster boy Sanchez anytime soon

though I understand what you mean…I would also expect Manning to go to a team that is decent and is a contender. Correct, we are not contenders right now, however, if he is interested in us (I don’t know why he would, but let’s make that assumption), I can’t see letting him go somewhere else.

by Chris3 on Jan 30, 2012 5:23 PM CST up reply actions  

They wouldn't dump him..

They’d just sit his ass on the bench. Which they should, especially if they have a chance of getting Manning. Sanchez hasn’t exactly lit the field on fire in NY. Its always been the defense that’s kept them in games, with Mark doing juuuust enough to squeak out wins, particularly in the post season.

Manning, though, makes them much more dangerous.

But if I were him, I’d be going to Denver. He wouldn’t have to face Miami and New England twice. The AFC West is much easier to get into the playoffs with.

by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 30, 2012 8:23 PM CST up reply actions  

If fully healthy...

… then the Vikings would have to consider Manning. He has proven through his absence how good he can make an offense look. He would be a great mentor for Ponder and Webb, the latter who could still have an active role in special packages.

If the Vikings could draft one of the top 2 LTs in the draft and sure up the RG position, the our line will be fine – benefiting emensely from Manning’s quick descision making, to quick release. Yes, we will need to pick up a #1 WR, but that could happen if we had Manning as our current QB, with a former 1st round pick learning in the background.

For Manning, there is the fact that he knows both Frasier and new defensive coordinator, Williams from their time with the Colts. Frasier is also great friends with Tony Dungy, and has shown a similar method of coaching at the beginning of his head coaching career.

There is also the little fact that Archie Manning also finished his career with the Vikings. We can only hope that if Peyton decided to do this too, that he has a much more successful time of it!

by blowfishes on Jan 30, 2012 4:55 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Part of the problem

Is that Manning is a bazillion times smarter than many coaches…

And those coaches would feel threatened by Manning constantly changing the call at the line and audible-ing and varying from the play.

Conflict is inevitable…

by liveforadrenaline on Jan 31, 2012 12:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Finally

someone who sees. I’ve been trying to state that now for days I guess those words just eluded my brain for some reason

by midnightwonder on Feb 1, 2012 7:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Only if for the right price.

I’d rather use picks and the money for improving our offensive line, receiver corps and secondary. It seems like, for the first time in a decade, we have a good answer (two, perhaps) to the QB question.

by JimClive on Jan 30, 2012 6:11 PM CST reply actions  

I see that many Viking fans across the web think that acquiring Manning would get the Vikings to the Superbowl. I don’t think Manning would even get the Vikings into the playoffs. I think the biggest thing that everyone needs to realize is that what the Vikings were during the last half of the 2000’s, they not that anymore. The concept of bringing in a 36 year old QB coming off three neck surgeries is simply based on nothing more than his last name. I think they need to commit to Ponder(or Webb, if that is who the Viking coaches determine to be the “guy”) and be done with it. No more playing games with QB’s, no more cycling QB’s in and out of the lineup, no more benching QB’s either cause they happen to make a lot of mistakes in a short period of time. Just commit to Ponder and be done with it.

by Timothy Bryce on Jan 30, 2012 6:29 PM CST reply actions  

Naw.................. I like Ponder

No Really, the more and more I see the statistical comparison of Ponder to other “use to be rookie” QBs, I think Ponder is going to do quite well. I’d rather see this team invest in a LT and a deep threat. (Oh yeah and do something in the defense back field)

Ponder may not ever be a Peyton Manning but he doesn’t need to be. He is very much capable of being an Eli Manning, who is really shining now. All Ponder needs is a supporting cast that is a big enough threat to give him more than one option (like not running for his life) on every play.

by fox1962 on Jan 30, 2012 6:51 PM CST reply actions  

Definitely YES!!!! Are you freaking kidding me?

Ponder is no guarantee. Anyone who says that is delusional. He has not proven that he can play in every game. He has just as much chance of being the next Matt Leinart. Webb is still developing and needs more reps throwing from within the pocket.

Manning will be released and not traded. If they pay him then they are going to keep him.

If he is released then he gets to go where he wants and it is probably not going to be the Jets or the Redskins. Here goes an article that makes some sense …

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8264abc5/article/with-indy-seemingly-turning-the-page-where-will-peyton-end-up

“Washington’s offensive line is every bit as bad as Indy’s and the roster is deprived of skill players. The Redskins also have a history of turmoil and instability. And don’t forget, in the NFC East, he’d be facing little brother Eli twice a year.”

“The Jets? Don’t get me started. With all the dysfunction in that locker room, Rex Ryan’s bluster, an overwhelming media glare and the constant hysteria of two Mannings in New York… No way I see Peyton walking into that cauldron. Not his scene.”

LaCanfora thinks it could be Arizona or Seattle. Arizona would have to improve their line and sign a free agent WR to go with Fitzgerald. But both are in the NFC West which could be up for grabs despite SF doing well this past season.

It could be Miami.

I doubt it is here as this team is going to be rebuilding. I would not put any money on Peyton wanting to come here and play behind this line. No way. Even if they did get Kalil they still need a guard or two. AP is not going to be back to 100% and we need a top WR to go with Percy. Too many holes on this team. And I did not even mention the awful defense.

Would any of you want to come to Minnesota with this current team?

The only position group on this team that you can feel comfortable about is the DE group. That is it. Everything else needs some serious attention. RB could be thought of as OK but AP may never be the same and even Toby had a meniscus. If Toby goes down early next year then who plays?

The answer is still YES though. Peyton Manning is a Hall of Fame QB. If they can somehow get him then they should do it. In 2009 the Vikings brought Favre in who carried the team all the way to the NFCCG. When he left they went 6-10 right away.

The money could be done easily too. The Vikings will have plenty of cap room.

I’ll take Manning all day every day and twice on Sunday.

But he ain’t coming here no matter how much they wanted to give him.

by MarkSP18 on Jan 30, 2012 9:20 PM CST reply actions  

Man see I just don't understand you sometimes

At times you seem to understand a building process then other times you jump right past it to instant gratification again. No matter what Payton is going to cost a crap ton, and he’s going to want to run the offense the way he runs the offense. Not much building going on there and our cap space goes poof with Allen, Peterson and Payton on the team.

The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.

by Grime on Jan 31, 2012 7:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Manning has made a mountain of money

And he’s smart, so I don’t think he would come to a rebuilding team with an incredibly iffy offense, an offensive coordinator who will take more years to learn on the job, and a head coach who hasn’t particularly proven adept at getting some effective execution anywhere on the field.

I don’t see Ziggy spending Manning’s kind of money when he is saving it up for a stadium…

by liveforadrenaline on Jan 31, 2012 12:27 PM CST up reply actions  

For Manning I would have to go for the instant gratification but I seriously doubt he would want to come here.

I mean I am not doing it for anyone. We are talking about a first ballot Hall of Fame QB that would instantly improve all aspects of the offense including Musgrave’s play calling.

He is a once in a lifetime QB. Like Favre but better and still will play a few more years provided he is cleared which is the basic assumption anyway.

by MarkSP18 on Jan 31, 2012 6:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah I get what your selling

Just so damn tired of picking up other peoples scraps.

The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.

by Grime on Feb 8, 2012 7:18 AM CST up reply actions  

I like Peyton

but not as a Viking. We aren’t good enough right now to take a chance on him. Not to mention he’ll get killed behind our O-line and his health would be a concern even if we had 5 certain future HOFers starting on the O-line.

Christian Ponder: Super Bowl 50 MVP for the Minnesota Vikings
For Basketball Reasons

by Td1984 on Jan 30, 2012 9:24 PM CST reply actions  

The only reason I voted yes for this idea,

if because Manning has been far and away my favorite player for quite a few years now. I respect how much understanding he has for the game and how it’s almost like an art form when he plays quarterback. I’m sure you can tell how much respect I have for Manning. He would have an insane wealth of knowledge to teach our younger guys. And I really get the feeling, because of the kind of man he is, that he would be willing to share as much as he could, unlike old number 4. I would absolutely love to see Manning in purple.

Unfortunately, it would never happen. The way that this team and organization are at this exact moment, I’m honestly afraid that we might not be able to attract ANY big name free agents. Manning will continue to be my favorite player. Unless he goes to the Jets. I cannot stand Rex Ryan.

by SirGrizzly on Jan 30, 2012 9:28 PM CST reply actions  

My Take

With Manning, the Colts were a perennial Super Bowl contender. Without him, they are the worst team in the league. He single-handedly makes awful teams relevant. I understand the neck is an issue, but if he could do it in Indy, why not here?

Hey Green Bay, where's your WNBA title???

by SDVike on Jan 30, 2012 9:29 PM CST reply actions  

I voted no for his sake

Don’t get me wrong I would love Manning on our team but he would get killed behind our O-line, and yes, I know he made Charlie Johnson look better than he is with his quick release but we need WR"s who get open consistantly and can stretch the field.

by nmvikesfan on Jan 30, 2012 9:36 PM CST reply actions  

Manning might get us to the Playoffs...

But unlike the Brett Favre run… the SB I don’t see as an option. Our defense is one of the worst and look where that got the Pack. The reason the Pats got this far is because their defense actually got much better in time for the playoffs and they also got to play Tebow.

We could run up the score during the regular season and win games perhaps but when playing the best of the best during the playoffs having a phenomenal offense or defense is great but you need to compliment it with at least a good opposite unit.

We won’t have anywhere near a good defensive unit going with Manning. Unless we struck absolute gold in the draft and free agency but going on that would be really naive.

by Crosseyes on Jan 30, 2012 11:30 PM CST reply actions  

Wtf

Let’s make sure we have a stadium and team first!

by going going gone on Jan 31, 2012 9:04 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Wtf

Let’s make sure we have a stadium and team first!

by going going gone on Jan 31, 2012 12:15 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Manning is an on the field OC.....

if you are willing to fire your OC then go for it.

by midnightwonder on Feb 1, 2012 7:39 AM CST reply actions  

I'm undecided

I haven’t thought about it much, since there is zero chance it’s happening. It makes no sense for him to come here, no way he’d do it. But I get that this is purely hypothetical. Still, torn between the fact that he’s the best QB out there imho, and it’d be tough to say no to adding that, and the fact that QB is so far down on our priority list it’s not even funny. The one thing I’ll add on that is that he would immediately make our O-Line look better than it is, since noone is better at reading a D and getting rid of the ball quickly (although Brees isn’t far behind).

However, my real reason for posting is to strongly disagree that 2009 was our only good experience with aging QBs. We had some good years with Cunningham, Moon, and even Jeff George…

by dumdristig on Feb 3, 2012 10:14 AM CST reply actions  

Update

I was listening to Mike & Mike this morning and they were talking about Peyton’s plan to NOT ask for some huge amount of up-front money to whatever team he goes to next. I’m paraphrasing, but apparently Peyton wants to ‘earn’ his money coming off this neck surgery. He’s going to a team for cheap (allegedly).
Now, either he’s being the normal class act that he always has been or he knows more about the severity of his neck injury than anyone else, sans his doctors. Either or both of these are completely believable.

Ponder needs more time. Let’s not forget he was supposed to watch and learn from McNabb in 2011. Instead he was thrown to the lions (err…Packers :p) after only about 6 games. I’m actually still behind the idea of giving him a year or two behind a vet/mentor… and I can’t think of anyone more qualified than Manning. I think Ponder showed a lot of great stuff and I believe if we had any kind of OLine and more receiving weapons all the NFL gurus would be talking about him right up there with rookies Newton and Dalton.

I know many of my fellow Norsemen here were pissing their pants for Joe Webb when he would come in (when defenses hadn’t gameplanned for him) and put on a show… and I love Spiderman… but I’m still very apprehensive about his potential to be ‘the future’.

If Manning isn’t asking for the world as far as a contract goes, you have to figure the Vikings will take a shot at him. He’d be coming into a team with Adrian Peterson, Percy Harvin, Kyle Rudolph, Michael Jenkins, likely a good FA WR, and (hopefully) Matt Kalil on a further improved Oline. Not too bad. Also, he’s worked with Frazier before when he was the Special Assistant to the Head Coach in Indy in 2005. He’s a guy that Musgrave wouldn’t even have to coach… and as we all know, Manning is a coach on the field.
Then again, the 49ers might more attractive to him, being that they were one game away from the Superbowl… and now big brother likely wants to pull even with Eli for rings ASAP. The question is- would Manning want to put up with a hotshot like Harbaugh?

Regardless, like KJ said, this is an unavoidable topic for us. Honestly, would anyone here really be mad if we got Peyton effing Manning healthy for a few seasons? Peyton Manning.

by Odin'sDrunkenSon on Feb 6, 2012 9:15 AM CST reply actions  

This seems

relatively likely for Manning, considering he did essentially turn down the long-term contract from the Colts because he knew his playing status was in jeopardy. Manning strikes me as the guy who wants to earn his place constantly, not fleece teams for money based off of past performance and reputation.

I don’t think that statement reflects in any way on his neck injury, except that he himself is uncertain how that will play out- but then again, such is the nature of said injury. If he was aware it’s more sever than being let out, I feel he would likely retire rather than risk serious, life-altering injury. The man does have two babies. And if he weren’t being a class act, then he’d get as much money as he could now, knowing it’s possible it’s his last paycheck as an NFL QB.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 7, 2012 1:23 PM CST up reply actions  

If we could get him for free

as in no trade I would do it, I would grumble but I would do it. Ponder does need some time to learn and honestly he’s not going to have a better teacher than Manning. Plus it makes the NFC north ridiculous at QB.

The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.

by Grime on Feb 8, 2012 7:21 AM CST up reply actions  

Been there done that

Vikes already tried with one Manning already, Archie was not the answer. Peyton would be just another immobile QB that would be little more than target practice for opposing defenses with the problemaic O-line. Stay the course, Ponder and Webb are the eventual solution.

by favregasms on Feb 7, 2012 12:51 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Why are we even discussing this?

There’s a better chance of the Vikings upgrading their QB position by drafting RG3 than there is of them signing Peyton Manning.

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Feb 7, 2012 1:01 PM CST reply actions  

It’s the off season, buddy : )

If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).

by Alittlemore_cowbell on Feb 7, 2012 1:04 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

True

But let’s talk draft, or realistic FA acquisitions…

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Feb 7, 2012 1:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Almost too early.

Draft stocks are going to rise and fall dramatically in the coming weeks/ months, and FA is hardly set- we haven’t a clue who’s going to be resigned/ let go. For example, Deion Branch and Mario Manningham are both set to be FAs (as is Wes Welker, but it’s pretty much set he ain’t goin nowhere), but we haven’t half a clue yet as to the Pats/ Giants intentions on those two.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 7, 2012 1:19 PM CST up reply actions  

With that logic

It’s equally too early to discuss Peyton Manning as a potential acquisition. He’s currently under contract with the Indianapolis Colts. He is not due a roster bonus until early March (likely the time when or if he will be cut/traded, etc.), the same time Free agency begins and after the Scouting Combine.

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Feb 7, 2012 2:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Fair enough, except-

it’s all but clear Manning is going to either be trade-bait or a FA. Do I know this for a fact? Of course not, but all signs are VERY much pointing that way. The other potential FAs across the league, for the most part, may very well end up staying home- especially players who are top-tier at their position, like Manning.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 7, 2012 7:20 PM CST up reply actions  

I honestly would be more surprised if Peyton gets cut/traded than I would if he ends up taking a pay cut to stay in Indy. I think it would be a PR nightmare for Irsay. Pagano also understands the value of having a veteran QB to bridge the gap while his rookie QB learns the ropes of the NFL.

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Feb 7, 2012 9:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Can he

Agree to forgo his roster bonus? I guess I doubt it.

by amiller92 on Feb 7, 2012 9:27 PM CST up reply actions  

He can agree to anything, per se.

If Irsay asked to renegotiate the contract, and Peyton said yes, they could theoretically re-structure it so he plays for the next ten years for $1 and a can of Coke Zero. The questions are- would Irsay WANT to even bother renegotiating at all, and would Peyton be willing to do so at this point? Neither seem to be best buddies anymore.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 8, 2012 7:30 PM CST up reply actions  

You sure?

I would think the cba would discourage that.

Then again, they can cut him and he can resign.

by amiller92 on Feb 8, 2012 10:39 PM CST up reply actions  

And besides

As bad as this season was, I’ve been looking forward to the draft since October.

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Feb 7, 2012 6:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Rec'd!

YOU try finding good stories right now, with Chris snatching up everything under the sun in five seconds! LOL- this running story helps me make quota!

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 7, 2012 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Dammit.

Took spanish, not french in High School. Whatever, I’m too lazy to change it, so I’ll just use the excuse that it gives the title “character”.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 7, 2012 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

No opinion change here

All the issues that were there before, are still there now. To answer the question about the trade, in no way does it makes sense to give up our first round #3 pick for Peyton Manning. Again, we have so many holes to fill that we can address with that high round pick. Trading that away for Manning would be about the dumbest move possible. Like I said above, it might get us a small upgrade at the QB position, but how is that going to address our major deficiencies along the OL, DB, WR, etc? It’s going to make it even harder to fill those needs, and I’d argue that Manning alone isnt’ going to get this team, as it is right now, any further than McNabb/Ponder/Webb could last year. We need that #3 pick for something other than another QB, be it Manning in a trade, or even Luck/RGIII.

As for the free agent thing…I’d rather us use our free agent money on a WR, or even Safety. We need to make some big splashes in free agency this year, and we have the money to do it. Wasting that on Manning will again, only get us a potential short-term benefit. If we use it on a young WR and/or S, we can make some longer term impacts with that money instead.

Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.

by CCNorsemen on Feb 7, 2012 1:23 PM CST reply actions  

Gotta Agree

CC, I really have to agree, we have went down this path too many times that works out for maybe a year and we are back to square one. Like my post “Peyton traded to Vikings” that got the crowd worked up. I can not see taking that kind of risk for short term fix, let’s stay the course and go for the long haul. No relation to Sabathia are you ?

by BleedPurple60 on Feb 7, 2012 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Ha ha...no relation

CC stands for Corpus Christi, where I’m currently living.

Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.

by CCNorsemen on Feb 7, 2012 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

food for thought

what if we got Peyton for relative peanuts (with lucrative performance based bonuses)…..and he helps entice Peirre Garcon to come to MN with him?

by michiganpat on Feb 8, 2012 7:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Signing Peyton

in such a manner would, IMO, make the move a no-brainer. The big question at THAT point would be getting him to come here. If Manning was into doing such a contract, there would be HUGE competition for him, and from teams far better prepared for SB runs than Minnesota.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 8, 2012 7:31 PM CST up reply actions  

If we could sign him for the vet minimum, maybe

I mean, obviously, there comes a point at which any player is worth signing. For me and signing Peyton Manning, that number is pretty low. For the Vikings? Who knows what that number is.

But even if you could sign Manning for virtually nothing, would you want to deprive our current young QBs the chance to grow and develop by doing rather than by watching? Webb got to watch Favre in 2010, and sat and watched McNabb/Ponder last year. I think he’s done enough watching. Ponder got to watch half a season of McNabb…and maybe he needs to sit and learn some more, but I don’t think so. Both of those guys need to be given their shot, and bringing in a guy like Manning will send the wrong message.

Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.

by CCNorsemen on Feb 13, 2012 8:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Pay We Would !

Roster Bonus, Draft picks or money we would definitely pay, for a roll of the dice.

by BleedPurple60 on Feb 7, 2012 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Good point.

Although, contracts can be renegotiated during trades. Remember, McNabb had a monster contract with the Redskins, but that went right out the window when he was traded to us.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 7, 2012 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Trade or Free Agent...

As a trade I say this is a no go. We need all our draft choices, and if we were to trade any of them, then that should only be to bring in a player who will be expected to contribute for at least the next 4 years minimum. I would also consider trading a late round pick for a better pick next year. Trading for Manning, even if he reduced his contract number before the trade, would not benefit the Vikings in any way.

Picking Manning up as a free agent would be a different matter. He would force the team to focus on the offensive line and receiver. It would mean that Peterson would not be expected to carry the offense on his back, giving him support whilst he comes back from his knee injury. Free agent receivers such as Vincent Jackson would be interested in coming to Minnesota, knowing that they will be playing with a great QB now, and a potentially quality QB in the future. He would help the offense with his knowledge of playing against different defenses, and Ponder would be able to absorb great knowledge from being tutored by Manning. Webb can still be utilised in special packages (please create some worth running).

The only issue with getting Manning is that unless he wins a Superbowl in his first 2 years, he will probably want to continue playing. The team will need to know what they have in Ponder as his rookie contract would be up the next year.

by blowfishes on Feb 7, 2012 2:08 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Agreed

Worth looking into as an UFA (especially with a low cost, bonus ladened contract) but not as a trade.

by socalminfan on Feb 7, 2012 2:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope.

If he hasn’t regained strength after three surgeries and a whole year of rest, I highly doubt he’ll be the same Payton when/if he comes back.

by Jepp The Viking on Feb 7, 2012 3:05 PM CST reply actions  

Press Releases

They are always trying to put up a smoke screen. Yet no one has seen a work out and how well he is doing and now they are reporting that he has 40% loss of arm strength. Who ever is doing the reporting it is a political game, to try gain an advantage. Too delicate of a surgery and too much of a risk. “Not Gonna Do It”

by BleedPurple60 on Feb 7, 2012 3:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Excluding money/previous injury...

Yes to the millionth power.

Look what we did with a 40 year old a few years ago? Obviously it’s been shown that teams really need a strong QB to go far in this league. If you could get a Manning that was at least as good as the last few seasons he’s had, then you’re on your way.

Our defense is halfway decent, the rest of our offense has people that can make plays, even with mediocre QBs. Colts were doing well with about the same with Manning, I would mind making the playoffs for however many years in a row like they did :P Even if only for just 3-4.

by loldotcom on Feb 7, 2012 3:47 PM CST reply actions  

Even assuming...

That Peyton is fully healthy, and has full arm strength… I don’t think it is a smart decision.

First, Peyton is going to want to run his offense. That means that Musgrave will spend a few years as a glorified positions coach, as trying to have Manning learn a new system would be counter-productive.

Second, he is going to want a lot of cash.

Third…. and arguably most important: We still don’t have a solid O-line. Has anyone seen Peyton Manning run? The guy is slower than Bryant McKinnie.

While he does have great pocket awareness, and can move around and avoid pressure well… we still have yet to learn how to create a pocket, so what good does his pocket presence provide us?

Now, I think he would be a great mentor for Ponder. But that is not what we would hire him for.

I would not be mad if it happened, but I can find better ways to improve our team.

by Bjorno on Feb 7, 2012 5:00 PM CST reply actions  

Giants TE position...

With the announcement that the Giants lost two of their TEs to serious knee injuries during the Superbowl, I think it is inevitable that they will have interest in re-signing Visanthe Shiancoe. Despite all the words about him being under utilised when he last played for them, there was some talk that a few coaches preferred him over Shockey. Having the chance to join a true contender (and reigning champions) might be enough for him to lower his salary asking figure too.

At this point, I would be hugely surprised if he returns to the Vikings… even if the team decided to make a play for Eli’s brother Peyton.

by blowfishes on Feb 7, 2012 6:01 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

This isn't like getting Favre

The Vikes aren’t as good as they were when they picked up Favre…a lot of holes have developed all over the place, and really it’s more than just “holes” in the offensive line and our secondary. We can’t just plug in a good QB and ride the success wagon like we did before.

And it’s simply not a smart move to throw away all our cap room on a short-term investment when we need to make a lot of long-term investments now.

Seriously, give Ponder an offensive line, and you won’t think twice about Manning.

by MrVikeGuy on Feb 7, 2012 6:26 PM CST reply actions  

Doesn't matter he won't come to MN

Manning is not going to a team that has won a combined 9 games in two years, has a aging and weak offensive line and huge holes on defense, and a division with three quality QBs. He can wait until his arm strength returns and he can go to any number of teams with a more complete team.

by Vikefandc on Feb 7, 2012 6:42 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

exactly

this is a stupid thread. Peyton can pick his team and it is difficult to understand why he would choose a team that has no OLine and No WR. Granted we can add a LT in the draft and maybe a WR in free agency, but the OLine is still a mess. This is not going to happen nor should it happen, the Vikes finally got off the QB merry go round and drafted a QB to develop.

by aceinthecorner on Feb 7, 2012 7:58 PM CST up reply actions  

This.

When Manning becomes a FA he’s going to have half a dozen teams looking for his services and honestly the Vikings will be at the bottom of that list. If for some reason he wants to come to Minnesota than by all means sign him if he’s healthy. A healthy Manning makes even a team with as many holes as the Vikings a playoff team in year one and a Superbowl contender in year two. That being said, there’s little reason he’d want to come to a rebuilding Vikings team when he could go to Miami, San Francisco, the Jets, or any other team that’s a lot closer to a Superbowl than Minnesota.

by CanadianViking on Feb 7, 2012 7:58 PM CST up reply actions  

(Sigh) Will this subject just die please?

It’s not happening, it won’t happen. No cap room, No offensive line, we don’t need the “tutor” thing again, and more then likely, no nerve which will equal little to no arm.

Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!

by VikesFaninNM on Feb 7, 2012 8:29 PM CST reply actions  

Not for the money

He will want

Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is a war room!

by VikesFaninNM on Feb 8, 2012 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

If.......

If Peyton Manning’s neck is 100% healed, playing MVP caliber football, and signs a deal with no guaranteed money and based on incentives………………the answer for me is still a big fat HELL NO!

by dsludo on Feb 7, 2012 8:43 PM CST reply actions  

As I replied to a similiar sentiment above-

why not?! You have arguably the best QB in the NFL, and in your scenario, remaining exactly that- and for an amazing contract situation? Why in the world would you turn that down?

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 8, 2012 7:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Main reason is because the rest of the team blows right now

And with Peyton, in my opinion, we would have a very low chance of winning a superbowl. His contract, with incentives, would still probably pay at least 15 mil….so no matter what it wouldnt be cap friendly. I just think we need to get some youth and look at the future. And also find out if Ponder is the qbotf or not…which I’m totally not even close to convinced that he is. But I’d rather find out sooner than later.

by dsludo on Feb 9, 2012 12:25 AM CST up reply actions  

can we quit talking about not having the cap room?

There have been several other threads, particularly in the personnel “project” vain where everyone has pointed out the salary floor and wondering if the Vikes pay their players what they are worth, then there will be too much cap room. And so, who are you going to pay the big bucks to? Would you rather have the money go to someone like Manning or someone like Chris Cook? The team’s two best players have decent contracts (Gerald Allen and AP), so, outside of them?

by Chris3 on Feb 7, 2012 9:55 PM CST reply actions  

we will still have McKinney on the books

as well as Madeiu I believe. We will have space but we have some hold overs from out cuts this year as well.

The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.

by Grime on Feb 8, 2012 7:23 AM CST up reply actions  

We do?

How, if they are both with new teams and ergo new contracts?

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 8, 2012 7:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Cap hit

Not necessarily paying them.

But I don know hw it works.

by amiller92 on Feb 8, 2012 10:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Too many excuses not to do it, should Manning become available.

I agree the decision has to be made on cost…more than just dollars, but I don’t think we worry about Ponder/Webb development. I don’t think we worry about Manning as a coach on the field and potential conflict with Musgrave….Manning will make Musgrave look like a freaking genius. He will also make decisions that make Frazier look like a good coach. Kind of like Favre did with Childress in 2009. Does he automatically make us a contender? Maybe not….however, the Giants were not even talked about for a playoff berth until the last 3 weeks of the regular season. Last year, Green Bay wasn’t talked about as a playoff team until after they got into the playoffs. The Arizona Cardinals in their super bowl run weren’t discussed as a playoff capable team. That’s why they play the game, folks, because funny things happen on the way to the coronation.

Some questions: Does adding Manning make this team better or worse than before? Definitely better.

I think one question people are forgetting about is that we need a lot of free agency talent. Top tier free agent wide receivers would probably be interested in playing with Manning, and possibly structure deals to allow that to happen. I would think any free agency linemen would too, if any exists. We may not be able to rebuild in a single year, but we could beef up the receiving corps through FA due to this….and get more interest in the offensive line, so we could spend a few draft picks on defensive backs than what I would at the current moment.

by Chris3 on Feb 7, 2012 10:07 PM CST reply actions  

the pulse

living here in indy and a life long viking fan, it seems there is developing very quickly real bad blood between irsay and peyton, who has been nothing but a claas act and a role model for that franchise. peyton has apparently been cleared by the doctors to play but per irsay, not by the team, appparently to be paid. granted the 28 mil is a huge amount of cash, but lets get one thing straight, peyton was almost single handedly responsible for the popularity of colts football here and the new stadium deal irsay was able to extort from the city. thus the money is really not that much in the grand scheme of things. peyton would no doubt bring to any team what he has delivered in indy and if the vikes had a shot a getting him, i’d say go for it! this is a team that built the dallas cowboy super bowl teams in exchange for a unproven running back. peyton manning would be well worth such consideration, although i would hope we would do our due dilligence.

by Harryaz on Feb 7, 2012 11:23 PM CST reply actions  

He's been cleared to play....

I read an article today that says he’s lost somewhere in the neighborhood of 40% of his throwing power. He’s still not 100% and likely won’t be for a while, if ever again. Irsay is doing exactly what he has to do. He has to release Manning and take Luck. As much as Manning means to Indy, it is ultimately a business and it is time to move on. Look at their new GM and coaching hires, it is a new era in Indy. They are reshaping the franchise without Manning.

by FLSKOLMAN on Feb 8, 2012 1:05 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

The ONLY answer

for the Vikes ‘problems’ is the draft….I know he’s not available, but, the only guy I’d take in FA would be Larry Fitz….that’s how strongly I feel about drafting….patch here, patch there, bring in the ‘ringer’, forgedabodit. Build for now AND the future.
The retirement of Jim K. marks the end of an era for the Vikes….time to start fresh.

by Paul Mooney on Feb 8, 2012 11:17 AM CST reply actions  

As an Indianapolis resident...

I have some news that just hasn’t been poured out to the public yet. I volunteered for the Sports Corp here during the Super Bowl, and talked to people within the Colts organization.

The reason he his current deemed ‘not healthy’ isn’t due to his neck problem. His neck and ‘bone regeneration’ blah blah, is cleared. The doctor has said he is fine to play football again, and he is not at any more risk than anyone else in the league.

What is wrong with him is that he can’t throw. His nerves were damaged and he quite literally cannot throw the ball. I don’t really understand all the scientific or neuro-biological stuff, all I know is that currently it is like he is throwing with his left hand… it’s all wonky.

He has been throwing with colts receivers lately and none of them have even come out and spoken about his abilities. This is the number one concern to me. I know that his receivers LOVE him, and the fact that none of them have even said something like “he’s improving” or “he is starting to look like his old self” bothers me.

This guy may never be able to throw like he used to.

Skol!

by Thor.in.your.side on Feb 8, 2012 11:48 AM CST reply actions  

Excellent insight

and exactly what I suspected was going on!

by Paul Mooney on Feb 8, 2012 12:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought

I remembered an article a bit ago where a Colts receiver (forget who) was saying Peyton’s ball had some of it’s old, serious “zip” on it. Granted, accuracy wasn’t mentioned, but this was even before the docs cleared him. I’ll look for the article and post a link if I can find it.

Regardless, if this is true, then yeah- no Peyton, no way.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 8, 2012 7:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Here we go.

Story here.

I was wrong- it was Addai, so technically not a receiver. And while it’s not exactly a full, 100% ringing endorsement, it sounded pretty good, and again, this was back in late December.

However, I also found this story. Pretty much sounds the opposite of the above story and backs Thor.in.your.side’s comments.

So yeah.

261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!

...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Feb 8, 2012 7:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Both Side

Both Sides do have an argument to be made. However, whats to say he won’t be injured again due to the fact that none of our QB’s have adequate time to drop back into the pocket. If we had a all-pro offensive line unit and we knew that he was going to be around for 3-4 years and play 100% of the time he was needed, then I would say we could do that. The Vikings have taken enough chances in gambling for certain formulas that copy other teams. Because this is a copycat league, when has the team that has copied another team actually turn out a Super Bowl winner? By then game plans are already drawn up for a target in those formations/matchups.

Frankly, I know this might sound copycat-ish, but the Vikes are going to need talented receivers for the next 5-6 years who want to win a super bowl and not be divas and make a huge pay day. If we get a guy like Vincent Jackson, I believe that his contract should have incentives such as touchdowns, catches, and a Super Bowl win and every time a player drops a pass that’s a routine type catch, it should be knocked off his next month’s pay. Frankly, if more incentives were put in to all contracts, maybe we would see better play out of those divas.

by Mike S on Feb 8, 2012 2:12 PM CST reply actions  

To add

I forgot to mention something else. As far as coaching goes, I wouldn’t mind getting for the owners to get into a bidding war to have him as a Quarterbacks coach ASAP. Frankly, I don’t believe Manning is going to have the “going away party” [if you can call it that] that Brett Favre received from the NFL. Therefore, do we expect him to be away from the game that long? How long after he retires as a player can we expect him to be hired to a coaching staff?

by Mike S on Feb 9, 2012 5:42 AM CST up reply actions  

This isn't serious, is it?

You people don’t REALLY think Peyton Manning would come to Minnesota, do you? If he wants to continue playing for a bad team, he’ll restructure his contract and stay in Indy. He’s only going someplace else to play for a contender, or a team that’s at least decent enough that he could lift them to contender status. Minnesota, unless you’re completely delusional, is not that team. They were a couple years ago, which is why Favre came here. They are now one of the worst teams in the league with numerous, and I mean numerous, holes. Peyton Manning’s not leaving Indy to play for a cellar dweller.

by frank_grimes on Feb 8, 2012 2:34 PM CST reply actions  

yeah, but in this business

you fill seats in stadiums (nor do you pay for new stadiums) by having a losing team for 4 or more straight years….unless you have some very popular studs that people will come to see.

by Chris3 on Feb 8, 2012 3:45 PM CST up reply actions  

In Indy it was Peyton's offense

If he comes here it will be a new offense . It will be getting his timing down with our receivers. No offensive line. High salary. Questionable health. Better off letting the younger guys compete for it.

by vking1 on Feb 8, 2012 8:18 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
You Can Breathe Slightly Easier
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image

Recent FanPosts

Jg_small
UBVs Special| Trivia! Can you name the Minnesota Vikings Starting QBs?
Small
Roster Analysis: Quarterbacks
Biggun_small
SUCK IT MARTY! - Stadium Passes MPLS 7-6
Imagescaj02y87_small
We get NO RESPECT!
Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall