Where We Discuss the Tarvaris Jackson Situation
When this season started, my mantra for the Vikings' passing offense was that this year's version couldn't possibly be any worse than last year's version. We had a quarterback with a bigger arm than we had in 2006, we had upgraded the overall talent at wide receiver (or, at the very worst, stayed the same), and we had a group of players in their second season of Brad Childress' West Coast offense.
The key to the Vikings' offensive improvement this year was going to be young Tarvaris Jackson. The second-year man out of I-AA Alabama State has all the physical gifts to be an outstanding quarterback at this level. He's mobile, he's got a live arm, he's got an outstanding work ethic, and he's doing the best job that he can with what he has.
Believe me, nobody is pulling harder for this kid to be a success at the NFL level than I am. The kid has talent. . .if he didn't, he wouldn't have been a second-round pick in the NFL Draft. Unfortunately, with what we've seen in his first four starts this season, he is clearly not ready to be a starter at the NFL level. He should be sitting on the bench and learning from a seasoned veteran, ready to take over the reins in 2008 or even beyond.
What's even more unfortunate is that the Vikings, thanks to Brad Childress' infinite stubbornness and inability to evaluate the progress of his players, don't currently HAVE anything better at the quarterback position to turn to. There's absolutely no point in playing Kelly Holcomb right now. Kelly Holcomb is not the future of the Minnesota Vikings. Neither is Brooks Bollinger. Whether Tarvaris Jackson is the future of the Minnesota Vikings or not is, at least in theory, still the subject of some debate.
But the signs have not been encouraging. After playing an average game at Chicago (and I say that because he had a LOT of passes that bounced off of the hands of his receivers that made his numbers look much worse than he actually played), #7 absolutely stunk up the joint against Dallas yesterday afternoon. On the first drive, he completed passes on consecutive plays to Adrian Peterson (for 12 yards) and Chester Taylor (3 yards). He didn't complete another pass until the third quarter.
Let me repeat that. The man managed to go almost a full half worth of game action (from midway through the first quarter to midway through the third quarter) without completing a pass.
Of his six completions of the day, only two went to wide receivers. Three of them went to Chester Taylor, and one each to Adrian Peterson, Bobby Wade, and Troy Williamson. No sign of Robert Ferguson, no sign of Sidney Rice, no sign of Visanthe Shiancoe. . .nothing at all. And this was different from the Chicago game in the sense that Jackson was just flat-out missing every receiver he threw to. The receivers had a few bad drops against the Bears, but against the Cowboys, I can't recall any receiver transgressions that were particularly egregious. No, this one falls on the shoulders of Jackson. Everyone knew that he was going to have to have a good game for the Vikings to win yesterday, and he was terrible.
But, again, it's not as though we have anything better to turn to. There's no reason to start anyone other than Jackson at quarterback the rest of the way. This team isn't contending for the playoffs or the Super Bowl. . .which is good, because at this point it appears that every NFL team that isn't the New England Patriots is going to spend the next 3+ months doing nothing more than playing for draft position.
(Honestly, as blasphemous as this might sound, a small part of me is rooting for Green Bay to make it to the Super Bowl this year. Watching New England crush some team's soul would be boring. . .watching New England crush the Packers' souls would be a thing of unparalleled beauty.)
But back to the Vikings. . .Tarvaris Jackson pretty much has to be the starter for the rest of this season, barring injury. Best case scenario, he gets better as he gets more playing time and gets more comfortable as an NFL quarterback. Worst case scenario. . .well, we should be in a fine position to get a quarterback high in the 2008 draft, whether that guy is Andre Woodson (my personal preference), Matt Ryan, Brian Brohm, or whoever is out there.
What would I do? Glad you asked. Four little steps.
1) As detailed above, Jackson starts for the rest of the year, unless he continues regressing to "completely and utterly awful" status.
2) Next season, give a call to a Mr. M. Schottenheimer. He's not real busy at the moment. A team with a mammoth offensive line, the most talented running back to come into the league in years, and a solid defense? Sounds like the definition of "Martyball" to me, and that's exactly the kind of football this team should be playing, given their current construction. As far as salary? Give the man whatever the hell he wants. If we're serious about building a winner here, we need a coach that's a proven winner, and there are few more proven winners out there than Marty Schottenheimer.
3) Draft one of the elite quarterback prospects at the top of the first round next year. Again, I'd prefer Andre Woodson, but Matt Ryan or Brian Brohm wouldn't make me sad, either. (Granted, if Atlanta finishes with a worse record than we do, there's no way that Bobby Petrino doesn't take Brohm, but I digress.)
4) After Schottenheimer is hired, re-sign that guy that's currently on a one-year contract to start for the Oakland Raiders. Yes, I speak of Daunte Culpepper. Now, I'm probably going to get hammered for this, but seriously people. . .try to tell me he's not infinitely better than anything we have at the quarterback position right now. You can't, because he IS infinitely better than anything we have at quarterback right now. It really isn't close. Get DC back here on a 2 or 3-year deal with the understanding that he's going to be mentoring Woodson or Ryan or Brohm.
The problems with the Vikings' offense can't be fixed this year. This year we're stuck with what we've got. But as soon as the final gun sounds in Denver that last week of December, the healing process should begin, and begin in earnest.
Scarlett/Rosie (hopefully) later on today. Continue enjoying your Monday as much as a Monday can possibly be enjoyed, folks.
0 recs |
4
comments
Comments
Nothing matters unless you run Peterson
No saving him - no working him in - run him and you will get MORE production in the 4th than you do in the 1st.
Any coach that says otherwise is coaching at his own peril...
by vikesrus on Oct 22, 2007 1:02 PM CDT 0 recs
gonzo
to address your solutions:
- Jackson has already reach the "completely and utterly awful" stage..no questions, no excuses...he's not ready, nor will he ever be
- Big Christmas wish! Although it would be a dream come true, ownership has given Chilly bear the nod of approval, and I don't foresee them canning the guy after 2 years...but I do think he will be on the proverbial "hot seat" next year
4. wow...I agree that he's better than anything we've currently got, but not by much...there are better posibilities next year, either through FA or trade: (listed in my order of preference)
Chris Simms
Chad Pennington
JP Losman
Rex Grossman (really, he's just misunderstood!)
Kurt Warner
Daunte Culpepper
and finally
Vinny....Vinny....Vinny
I bitched about our lack of recievers earlier in the year, and although we don't have the prettiest crop in the NFL, I believe they are servicable. When we're running a 3 reciever set, and a TE, Jackson isn't even getting to his second read. There's guys open...he just not adept enough to go through the reads...what a difference watching TJ in the pocket and Romo in the pocket...and that guy only has 16 games started.... The times he does pull the trigger, he's throwing the ball in the wrong places. Good example is you pointing out NO balls thrown to the TE. They ran AD out of the slot a couple times...talk about a decoy...you can't tell me the TE isn't open once the whole game?
I pegged us for 6-10 this year, and if the QB play continues like Sunday, we'll picking top 3 next April...I still think this season can be salvaged, but not in the hands of TJ. I know..every NFL started has been raw, and struggled during their first years, but that performance Sunday was pathetic, and wasted a great effort by our defense....
I expect Winfield to begin voicing his opinion any week now....
by lowcountry viking on Oct 22, 2007 2:50 PM CDT 0 recs
Answers
The pace is way to fast for TJ thats why he misses so many recievers.By the time he does throw the recievers have moved on.
Actually Cook cost us that game yesterday.Running out onto the field we had to use a time out and froze our own kicker.If remember right he had a few more mistakes.
But we are stuck with what we have and it aint going to be pretty.But we have been in every game so far not like teams have been coming in and beating us by 30.
Practices this week and next should be just TJ throwing to the recievers.5 hours a day just throwing and getting a groove with the recievers.Our Def is good except they can practice againts the Pass the next 2 weeks.Dont need work on run Def or running the ball or the kicking game.
by speedlod on Oct 22, 2007 4:25 PM CDT 0 recs
could get help
by tedward on Oct 22, 2007 10:13 PM CDT 0 recs








