Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Fighters React to Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Should the Vikings Shut Down Adrian Peterson?

As you can see over on the right-hand side of the page there, what we have on our hands here is a bit of a situation.  We all had to fear that this question was going to have to be asked eventually, but we also all hoped that we could put it off for as long as possible.  Unfortunately, now is the time for it to be answered.

The Beloved Purple are 3-6, ladies and gentlemen.  The playoffs are nothing more than a pipe dream at this point, and .500 looks like it would probably take an act of Congress to make happen.  There's no help on the immediate horizon at the quarterback position, there doesn't appear to be any desire on either side of the ball at this point, and Brad Childress is still the head coach.  Add it all up, and it's looking to be a long last seven weeks of the 2007 season for all of us.

Don't get me wrong, folks. . .I have the same sort of selfishness that I'm sure some of you do.  There's a part of me that wants to see Adrian Peterson out on the field as much as possible.  I want the highlight reel to get longer.  I want more defenders to look foolish.  I want more of Paul Allen screaming "TOUCHDOWN ADRIAN PETERSON!!"    The kid has been the biggest. . .and, more often than not, the only. . .highlight of the 2007 season for the Vikings.  Two of our three victories to this point have come almost exclusively due to the talents of #28.

But you know something?  There comes a time when a team has to step back and say to themselves, "We need to look past this season and on to next year."  This, folks, is one of those times.  Sure, we'd all love to see AP bring home the Rookie of the Year Award and go to the Pro Bowl and all give us even more hope for 2008 and beyond.  But it's not worth it, folks.  Not for this season, and certainly not for this coach.

In my personal opinion, the next time we see Adrian Peterson on the field should be the 2008 pre-season.  Not against the Giants in two weeks, not against the Lions in three weeks, not even in the season finale against Denver.  August of 2008 should be the next game Adrian Peterson plays for the Vikings.

And it kills me to say that, as I'm sure it kills all of you to think it.  We've spent money on the 2007 Vikings in the form of tickets, jerseys, hats, concessions, whatever the case might be.  Like every other fan base, we want success and we want it NOW, and we know that Adrian Peterson gives us the best opportunity for that success.  But we're not going to have that success in 2008, regardless of whether Adrian Peterson is on the field or not.  Granted, if Peterson doesn't play the rest of the way, there's a good chance we might not win another game.  If he does play, we could possibly. . .maybe. . .struggle to 6-10.

Is the difference between 3-13 and 6-10 REALLY that great?

Is it worth endangering the future of a guy that's already the best at his position in the NFL?

Is it worth gambling the future of this franchise on?

Short answer:  No.  Slightly longer, more elaborate answer:  Hell no.

Now, in my opinion, shutting Adrian Peterson down for the rest of the year would be the common sense approach as it pertains to the future of this franchise.  However, there's one problem in the equation that obstructs both common sense AND the future of this franchise.

In this case, I have seen the enemy. . .and he is Brad Childress.

After inheriting a team from Mike Tice that went 9-7 in 2005 and was, by and large, full of miscreants, Brad Childress went to work upgrading the talent level on the Vikings' roster.  He was going to have a full season of "game manager" Brad Johnson at quarterback. . .a healthy Koren Robinson with a new lease on life to lead the receiving corps. . .Steve Hutchinson and Chester Taylor to shore up the running game, and so forth.  The result?  6-10.

So this off-season, the Vikings spent little in the way of big-time free agents, and added the talents from an outstanding draft class that has shown a lot of promise to this point.  The result?  A 3-6 start. . .and it's going to require a monumental effort to match that 6-10 mark from a year ago.

Brad Childress has to know. . .or, at least, he SHOULD know. . .that he's on the hot seat at this point.  But, as I've said in a couple of other stories on this site, the most basic human instinct that there is is the overriding desire for self-preservation.  This, folks, is exactly what worries me on this subject.  Childress HAS to know that his best chance to win. . .and, as a result, save his bacon. . .rests in the capable hands and feet of Adrian Peterson.  Quite frankly, Childress seems like the kind of guy that would put Peterson back out on the field and put him at risk if it meant a few more Vikings' victories and a chance for him to come back and run this team further into the ground in 2008.  I don't want to see that happen.

Don't get me wrong, ladies and gentlemen. . .I'll cheer for the Beloved Purple to win every single time they step out on the field, regardless of the personnel that's out there and regardless of who the coach is on the sideline.  If the Vikings were to somehow reel off seven victories in a row and roar into the playoff as a wild card at 10-6, I'd be the happiest Viking fan on the Gulf Coast.  But I'm enough of a realist to know that such a thing has a much of a chance of happening as someone getting struck by lightning five minutes after they win the lottery.  Putting AP on IR ASAP guarantees a healthy Adrian Peterson at the start of 2008 and increases the likelihood that Brad Childress will be in the unemployment line after the season finale in Denver.

Both of those things are what's best for the franchise at this point, both short-term and long-term.  With the way the 2007 season has gone, I think that's the way we need to view things at this point.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Zigi
I hope to god that Zigi has enough wits about him to shut Peterson down if Childress won't do it. He himself said it would take some time to rebuild this club and a 3-13 or 4-12 record will bring us that much closer to another key piece in the draft (A real QB). He should give Chili an ultimatum: win some games without Peterson and we'll start to think about keeping you around.

by The Inevitable Muck Up on Nov 14, 2007 12:53 AM CST reply actions  

Don't be silly
"The playoffs are nothing more than a pipe dream at this point, and .500 looks like it would probably take an act of Congress to make happen."

Not even an act of congress is going to salvage this disaster of a season.

I agree, shut down AP, fire Childress NOW, get a good draft pick and plenty of time to find a coach who knows how to. . .I don't know. . .coach?

by dperl99 on Nov 14, 2007 9:58 AM CST reply actions  

Not so fast
For the rest of the season? I'm tempted to agree, but I can't quite do it.  AD should sit until he's for sure 100%. It would be absolutely ridiculous if he went back in at less than 100%, no question about that.  

From the sounds of the injury, this should be mean sitting at least 2 weeks and more than likely 3 or 4. So, that means he'll be back for the last 3 or 4 games.  It might be good experience for him to work hard at rehab, get his injury taken care of and back on the field.  If he is so "injury prone" (I don't think he is, but this knee injury isn't helping that argument) then he needs some more experience with rehab and getting back to where he can help the team, which is on the field.  

I'm pretty sure that Childress has done enough to get himself fired, so just playing AD to get a few more wins isn't going to save his job.  

If AD goes back in after he's 100% and gets injured again, then maybe we are looking at an injury prone guy. Maybe that's something the Vikings need to address.  

I think AD still has some learning to do in the pass protection schemes and this is a good chance to get him some more reps at game pace to get all those things down. That way we don't have to see him go on the sidelines on 3rd and long all the time.  Getting him 3 or 4 more games of experience is going to help the kid, even if the Vikes are out of the playoff hunt. He'll be that much better for the 2008 season. And we'll find out how well he can rehab and get back on the field in case he does, gulp, suffer another injury (knock on wood).  

Let the kid play. Get rid of Childress. Get a QB that can play.

by Danielle on Nov 14, 2007 10:30 AM CST reply actions  

AD won't be 100% healthy the rest of the year
Danielle.

This kind of injury normally takes 6 weeks to allow him to return to full activity, but it's 10-12 weeks to be back to normal.

Thus if you sit him until he's 100%, thats after the season is over.

VikeGuru is a doofus!!

by Unclebillybonz on Nov 14, 2007 11:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Everyone heals differently
Gonzo supplied us with one explanation of a LCL tear: "Flexibility is usually normal in 2-4 weeks. Full return to vigorous pursuits in 3 - 6 weeks. Return to normal in 10-12 weeks."

I'm not sure where he got this or what these time lines are based on, but it's not the same for everyone.  Since all of AD's other ligaments are stable and he's a well conditioned athlete, I'd expect he could heal rather quickly from this.  "Return to vigorous pursuits" sounds 100% to me and that's as short as 3 weeks.  

Twin Cities Vikings Now blog said "Green Bay Packers quarterback Brett Favre suffered an LCL sprain in 2002, but he didn't miss a start." I'm guessing he wasn't 100% and playing QB is different on your knee than at running back, but he didn't sit out 10 weeks for it to go back to normal.

But, if he's not back to 100%, then sit him. If there's any risk he could injure it more, it's not worth it.

by Danielle on Nov 14, 2007 12:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Agree
But I really cannot stress enough that we absolutely should wait until Peterson is 100%.  And even then, I wouldn't play him as the starter.  Maybe give him about 25-30% of the carries. I totally agree that there is still valuable experience left for him to gain his rookie year.  That would be the ideal situation in my opinion.

That said, I'm not totally opposed to placing him on IR either.  That way, Childress won't be able to try to save his coaching career at Peterson's risk.  And also, with AD's passion for the game and desire to win, if he isn't on IR, you know that he himself is going to want to be on the field as soon as possible.

I really really hope the Vikes dont mess this up.    Marty Schottenheimer and a high 1st-round QB is starting to sound pretty amazing to me.

by cruton647 on Nov 15, 2007 4:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
2012 Draft Player Rankings: Top 10 UPDATE 1.0

Recent FanPosts

Small
Vincent Jackson?
Deathstarvikings_small
Siefert's All NFC North Team
Beardy_small
What luck... A potential FA LT that is actually good...
Small
Vikings 2012 Starting Offensive Linemen
Vikings3_small
Patriots after Spygate, 4-4 in playoffs 0-2 in SB
Snickers_small
What I'll Be Doing Today (Super Bowl)
Sophialoren_janemansfield1_small
Interesting RGIII interview with Sports Illustrated
Small
Good News Everyone
Biggun_small
Vote:Patriots or Giants
Small
Feeling Lucky?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Kira_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall