Daily Norseman: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Mr. Conlin, Mr. Smith. . .Mr. Smith, Mr. Conlin. . .

I SCREAM!  ALL THE TIME!  THEREFORE MY OPINION IS BETTER AND MORE IMPORTANT THAN YOUR OPINION!!  WHY ARE YOU LAUGHING AT ME!?  DON'T YOU KNOW WHO I AM?!
If you'll recall, I wrote a piece a week or so back about Philadelphia sports hack Bill Conlin saying that. . .well, in so many words, he's not a big fan of blogger types.

Well, apparently Conlin has an ally in the War on Blogs.  Gentlemen, let me introduce you to ESPN employee Screamin' A. Stephen A. Smith.

"And when you look at the internet business, what's dangerous about it is that people who are clearly unqualified get to disseminate their piece to the masses. I respect the journalism industry, and the fact of the matter is ...someone with no training should not be allowed to have any kind of format whatsoever to disseminate to the masses to the level which they can. They are not trained. Not experts. More important are the level of ethics and integrity that comes along with the quote-unqoute profession hasn't been firmly established and entrenched in the minds of those who've been given that license.

"Therefore, there's a total disregard, a level of wrecklessness that ends up being a domino effect. And the people who suffer are the common viewers out there and, more importantly, those in the industry who haven't been fortunate to get a radio or television deal and only rely on the written word. And now they've been sabotaged. Not because of me. Or like me. But because of the industry or the world has allowed the average joe to resemble a professional without any credentials whatsoever."

Really?  Seriously?  Are you joking me here?

Now, while Smith isn't advocating the kind of bloggercide. . .is that a word?  Hell, it is now.  Let me start again.

While Smith isn't advocating the kind of bloggercide that Conlin was obviously pushing for, his words are pretty disturbing in their own right.  Let's start at the very beginning. . .a very good place to start.

Smith says that people who are "clearly unqualified" get to disseminate their piece to the masses, and that that's dangerous?  Why, exactly, would anybody see this as dangerous?  The free exchange of information is what the 21st Century is all about here, Stephen.  What "qualifications" do I need, exactly?  Am I required to have a college degree or something like that before I'm allowed to "disseminate my piece to the masses?"

Now, don't get me wrong. . .I realize that the guys that write for the Star-Tribune and the Pioneer Press in the Twin Cities are "professionals," and have all sorts of formal training in the field of journalism.  I, on the other hand, do not.  What I do have is a firm grasp of the English language (or, at least, I'd like to believe that's the case), a burning desire to talk about my favorite sports team, and a forum to express my opinions and analysis (such as it is) of that team.  Honestly, that sounds like all the qualification I should need.

However, in the end, "qualification" really has nothing to do with the message being conveyed.  If someone, be they a Viking fan or otherwise, comes to this site and draws the conclusion that I don't have any idea what the hell I'm talking about, they can go away and not come back.  That's their choice.  They don't have to "suffer" through my stuff to get to something else.  It's a lot like when I'm driving in my car and have my XM Radio tuned to ESPN Radio.  I don't have to "suffer" through the Stephen A. Smith show from 2 to 3 PM Central Time to get to something that doesn't suck.  I can flip the radio to a different station until I see 3 PM on my watch or on the car stereo, and turn it back to ESPN Radio to get to something good.

Amazing how that works, isn't it?

And honestly, how much qualification does it take to sit in a studio in Bristol, CT and yell "THE NEW YORK KNICKS ARE TERRIBLE!!" for an hour?  Seriously, have you ever listened to this guy?  Take Jim Rome, subtract all the charisma, deduct 90% of the insight, double the volume. . .and you have Stephen A. Smith.  Bear in mind, I say this never having really ever been a Jim Rome "fan," but I'd much rather listen to Rome than this schmoe.

Smith then goes on to talk about the levels of "ethics and integrity" that we as bloggers have.  Really, this is fairly insulting.  Didn't ESPN, with all their sources and all their ethics and all their integrity run with a story about a college football coach that they swore up and down was going to change jobs just this past weekend?  And didn't that coach call a press conference specifically to pimp-slap ESPN and all their sources and all their ethics and all their integrity while declaring to the world that he wasn't leaving his current job?

See, we in the blogging community don't have this problem.  Ordinarily, we don't have "sources" for this sort of thing.  We take the things that are being reported by people WITH sources, and comment on them.  What's wrong with that?  Hell, speculation and conjecture is what today's sports talk radio was BUILT on, for crying out loud!  The thing is, the speculation and conjecture is supposed to come from us, the unwashed masses, the non-"professionals," as it were.  Not from the people that are allegedly "qualified" to give us our information.

Smith concludes by saying that his industry is "suffering" because it's allowing "the average joe to resemble a professional with no credentials whatsoever."

Wrong again, Stephen A.

Take a look around, if you will.  According to our statistics, between the numerous blogs on the SBNation network, we average between 145,000 and 150,000 visits EVERY SINGLE DAY.  This site is a very small percentage of that number (usually around 500-600 a day, with some days where we do a lot more).  In the 17 months I've been running this site on the network, over 110,000 hits have been registered.  Nobody's forcing anyone to come to this site to read what I have to say, and I'd really like to think that nobody's "suffering" as a result of coming here.

(Except for Packer, Bear, and Lions fans.  Their suffering means very little to me.  But I digress.)

The sports blogosphere isn't going away, Stephen.  It's going to keep expanding.  Do you want to feel less threatened by "average joes" like myself and the rest of SBNation?

Try sucking less.  And for the love of God, stop yelling all the damn time.

0 recs  |  Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

We still love you....even if Stephen A. doesn't!
Seriously, I know you probably don't get a lot of thanks for what you do here, but I, for one, would like to take this opportunity to do so.  

There's nobody that makes me come to your site several times a day to read your opinions and thoughts.  I do, however, hold those opinions in high regard, and thank you for enlightening us on the latest with our beloved purple.  

Let's hope they can continue this streak and keep making improvements every game.  I gotta say that the majority of the Vikes fate this year lies on the shoulders of TJack.  We'll see if he can keep up the solid play.  Go Vikes!!!

by swensicle on Dec 5, 2007 1:29 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

What a...
I get almost all my sports news and analysis from blogs.  Yeah, my homepage is CBS Sportsline, but only to check scores and to see the weekly Power Rankings (I love those things).

Other than that, I read your Vikings stuff, Gonzo.  You are the best (believe it or not, but you so are).  I check out a couple (ok, like 8 or 9) Ohio State blogs, the occasional Detroit Tigers or Red Wings blog, and a handful of humor and political news blogs.  I never listen to the radio and rarely go to ESPN.com (those guys are idiots).  Blogs scare the crapola out of "REAL NEWS GUYS" because circulation is dwindling almost across the board and oftentimes the writing is better than the "RNGs."  So far as fact-checking goes, I have seen countless times bloggers call each other on mistakes, gaffes, bald-faced lies, and small errors that to be so bold as to say blogs are unreliable?  Well, that's total and complete [expletive withheld].  For a perfect picture of this, mgoblog, a Michigan Wolverines blog reported Kirk Ferentz as just about to accept the head-coaching job.  Within hours, he was called out, defended himself, and later laid out all his cards so we could see he's not full of crap.  Kirk Herbstreit reports days later that Les Miles is the new head coach at UofM, which is later proven beyond a doubt to be totally false, and we get no apology, no redaction, just smug denial of what went down.  

Bloggers are just as valid a source of news and information, if not sometimes better, than "RNGs."  Pat yourself on the back Gonzo.  I hope you're making some extra cheese off your blogads.  You've earned it.

And thanks for keeping up with this kick-ass blog.

by NMUSpidey on Dec 5, 2007 8:19 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

meh
I enjoy your knocking around these MSM douches who slag on bloggers. But I don't consider them disturbing or threatening. It's funny. I enjoy watching their tantrums. The code of journalistic honor and the safeguards of journalistic editing are utter shams. We see this repeatedly. There is no editor who can provide the fact-checking that can be provided by a swarm of commenters. Fact-checking these people is some J-school graduate with an undergrad major in Communications. Maybe some college summer interns too. Wow. On the other hand, fact-checkers for bloggers with significant readership include lawyers, doctors, construction workers, professional athletes, government workers, etc. If a blogger says something stupid his feet are held to the fire in his own comments by people who actually understand the subject matter. Journalists resent that kind of expert feedback. If they ever find the time to place a "correction" in next week's edition, they'll still attack the source of the correction as a well-financed interest group with partisan motives. They are the bitter, dying aristocracy. Blogs represent the rise of journalistic democracy. The truth will out, and the cream will rise. It's a marketplace of ideas, not a take-what-you're-given Truth repository.

by ss on Dec 5, 2007 9:15 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

"Unqualified"
To become a "qualified" journalist you have to take classes, pass exams, get a degree, etc.  To say that it doesn't take much to do what Stephen A. Smith does is a little juvenile. Yes, maybe to you and me it seems that all he does is yell on national television, but he worked his way up to that spot just like someone might work hard to become a teacher or CEO or whatever it may be.  I'm just saying that insulting him or mocking journalism isn't going to help this argument much.

That said, I do realize that most bloggers probably aren't journalists.  I also realize that not very many of them claim to be.  It's one thing if you're pretending to be qualified or claiming to have some sort of certification, but most bloggers aren't!  They're sharing their views and opinions and it's our choice to read them.  Most late breaking insider information gets cited from a "qualified" journalism source like the Star Tribune for example.  For Stephen A. Smith to claim that bloggers are "dangerous" is pretty ridiculous.  It's just like anything else out there, if you don't like it, don't watch it, read it or listen to it.  There's nothing dangerous about reading a sports blogger (unless you find yourself at a packer website or something crazy!).  

So, I'll repeat what's been commented above and say to you Gonzo, thank you.  Keep up your unqualified journalistic style of writing. Internet viewers beware...there's a blogger here, but I'm gonna read it anyways!!!

by Danielle on Dec 5, 2007 10:44 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

The entrenched establishment
never goes down without a fight. Every day the "professional" journalist becomes less relevant, and every day they become more desperate. Some of the stuff he said was pathetic. "Someone with no training should not be allowed to have any kind of format whatsoever to disseminate to the masses." Uh, it's called the First Amendment.

by chacabuco on Dec 6, 2007 1:03 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!
Start posting about the Vikings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Operahouse_small
Start Wearing Purple
Vikes_small
Deion Sanders on NFL network
Zygi_wario_solo_small
Just a quick reminder

Recent FanPosts

Small
Welp. Looks like the Vikings are screwed
Throwdpeterson_small
Fellow Norseman, the Time Has Come!
Small
Visanthe Shiancoe second only to Tony Gonzalez in TDs since 2008
Vikings_small
Week 9 Vikings Win?
P1060527_small
Readers Rides, or, bye week boredom.
Favre_viking_small
FAVRE = 1,2,3,4
Tommy-kramer-_small
Win /Loss records without Tomato Can Victories
Images_small
Accuscore Report
P1060527_small
Bye week thoughts on upcoming 2nd half.
Small
All About "Housh"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Head Coach

Dailynorseman_small Gonzo

Coordinators

Me_at_the_vikings_game_small ericj69

Childress_small Anthony21