clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Progression of the Athlete

In case you missed it, Gonzo has a great look at the history of Viking's first round draft picks.

Although I'm sure highly irregular, I wanted to start off my posting privileges with something not focused on the Vikings. The Draft is three months away, so there's plenty of time to get excited for that. For now, though, I wanted to share with you something that's been on my mind for a while.

Which sport has the best overall athletes? For a while I was convinced that the National Basketball Association easily won that honor. All one needed to do was gaze at LeBron James (who is almost exactly the same size and height of Carlos Boozer) and you could tell that basketball players were of a special breed.

Then along came Larry Fitzgerald. With hands that bleed Elmers glue, Fitzgerald has received national attention as one of the greatest receivers of all time. That's no small feat, considering what a small market Arizona is.

If you put LeBron James on the football field, I shudder to think what could happen. James is the kind of athlete who could play virtually any position on the field and dominate.

When you step back and take a look at the state of the National Football League, you realize how many "freaks of nature" there are. Offensive guards who can run as fast as some backs. 300-pound tackles with 4 percent body fat. Quarterbacks who can throw a bundle of air wrapped in pigskin over 80 yards. The list of outstanding athletes never stops.

You have to be a heck of an athlete to play at the NFL level.

There is a shortage of superb quarterbacks in football. Sure, Peyton Manning and Tom Brady are amazing, but the list ends there. Guys like Big Ben, Drew Brees, and Eli Manning can be great at times, but can't be classified as "elite."

What is the reason for this? Is there really that much difference in talent when comparing the defenses and offenses of the NFL? Surely not.

A large part of the answer lies in college football. As the years go by, there are fewer and fewer amounts of athletes who go from dominating the NCAA to dominating at the professional level. Obviously, there are exceptions - Peyton Manning, for starters.

But most others who dominate the college level fail to leave their mark on the NFL. Just eight Heisman Trophy winners are in Canton, Ohio. Chris Weinke is a perfect example of a dominant college QB gone wrong, and guys like Matthew Stafford may be the next down that path.

Stafford, who is being discussed as a possible first overall pick, is really not a great quarterback. Here's a look at this stats from this past year.

Passing Rushing Sacks
G Rating Comp Att Pct Yds Y/G Y/A TD INT Rush Yds Y/G Avg TD Sack YdsL
2008 - Matthew Stafford 13 150.8 235 383 61.4 3459 266.1 14.7 23 12 55 40 3.1 0.7 1 - -

Sure, they're fine. While highly debatable, at best I see Stafford at the same level of JaMarcus Russell.

The bottom line is that athletes in the NFL are getting bigger, stronger, faster, and smarter. If you have been a professional football player, you possess an extremely rare set of genes.

NFL players are progressing in every sense of the word, and that's not necessarily a good thing.

How does this apply to the present? To be honest, I have no clue. I haven't the foggiest idea how to put a limit on how good athletes are. Before we know it, two 275-pound men will collide on a special teams play and somebody will end up dying on the field. Think Willis McGahee x5.

The hits are getting harder. The coaching is getting smarter. The athletes are getting bigger.

Too much of a good thing, or will athletes never stop getting better?


Thanks for sticking around and hearing out my rambling. Please let me know what you think, and know that we'll get back to Vikings coverage very soon.